Dinesh B.Amin vs The Managing Partner, M/S Raj Fishmeal and Oil Company, Udupi Advocate - Abhishesk Kaniyoor — 3/2021

Case under Industrial Disputes Act Section U/Sec.10-4A. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.

Ref.10.1.C.OF ID ACT

CNR: KAUP010000772021

HEARING

Next Hearing

13th March 2026

Filing Number

3/2021

Filing Date

04-01-2021

Registration No

3/2021

Registration Date

18-01-2021

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, UDUPI

Judge

507-Prl District and Sessions Judge

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act Section U/Sec.10-4A

Petitioner(s)

Dinesh B.Amin

Adv. NAGARAJ.K

Respondent(s)

The Managing Partner, M/S Raj Fishmeal and Oil Company, Udupi Advocate - Abhishesk Kaniyoor

Hearing History

Judge: 507-Prl District and Sessions Judge

06-03-2026

HEARING

27-02-2026

ORDERS

26-02-2026

ORDERS

17-02-2026

HEARING

07-02-2026

ORDERS

Interim Orders

15-07-2021
Deposition
17-08-2021
Deposition
22-07-2022
Orders
19-04-2023
Orders
02-06-2023
Deposition
15-07-2023
Deposition

Summary This is a Labor Court order (I.D. No. 3/2021, M.W. 1) from Udupi, Karnataka dated July 15, 2023, in Kannada. The court found multiple procedural irregularities in the internal inquiry conducted against a worker and set aside the inquiry proceedings. The court held that the employer failed to provide the worker adequate opportunity to respond to charges, did not properly conduct cross-examination of witnesses, and violated natural justice principles throughout the investigation process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a Labor Court order (I.D. No. 3/2021, M.W. 1) from Udupi, Karnataka dated July 15, 2023, in Kannada. The court found multiple procedural irregularities in the internal inquiry conducted against a worker and set aside the inquiry proceedings. The court held that the employer failed to provide the worker adequate opportunity to respond to charges, did not properly conduct cross-examination of witnesses, and violated natural justice principles throughout the investigation process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, UDUPI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case