Sadashiva S/o Krishnappa Hegde, A/a 63 yrs, R/at Matagan, Sarakuli Post Umbalamane Village Siddapur vs Venkatraman Manjunath Hegde, A/a 53 yrs, R/at Mundigesara, Umbalamane Village, Siddapur Taluk — 88/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7Rule1. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAUK910020322022

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

Filing Number

84/2022

Filing Date

22-09-2022

Registration No

88/2022

Registration Date

01-10-2022

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDDAPUR

Judge

531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7Rule1

Petitioner(s)

Sadashiva S/o Krishnappa Hegde, A/a 63 yrs, R/at Matagan, Sarakuli Post Umbalamane Village Siddapur

Adv. SRI. RAGHUPATI SHRIPATI HEGDE

Respondent(s)

Venkatraman Manjunath Hegde, A/a 53 yrs, R/at Mundigesara, Umbalamane Village, Siddapur Taluk

Hearing History

Judge: 531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR

21-04-2026

EVIDENCE

01-04-2026

EVIDENCE

24-03-2026

EVIDENCE

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE

02-03-2026

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

08-07-2024
Issue
05-03-2025
Deposition
08-07-2025
Deposition

Case 88/2022 Summary Outcome: The case was adjourned. Witness examination was scheduled for 08-07-2025. Multiple property documents relating to survey numbers 59/3 and 59/4 in Umbalamane village (covering assessment years 2021-2022 and 2024-2025) and revenue records were produced as evidence and marked. The respondent's counsel requested time to file a written statement, which was granted, and the case was postponed for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 88/2022 Summary Outcome: The case was adjourned. Witness examination was scheduled for 08-07-2025. Multiple property documents relating to survey numbers 59/3 and 59/4 in Umbalamane village (covering assessment years 2021-2022 and 2024-2025) and revenue records were produced as evidence and marked. The respondent's counsel requested time to file a written statement, which was granted, and the case was postponed for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDDAPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case