Chidananda Ganapati Hegde, Age 39, Shigehalli, Siddapur vs Laxminarayan Ganapati Hegde, Age 61, Shigehalli, Siddapur — 6/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 54. Status: AWAIT REPORT. Next hearing: 25th April 2026.
FDP - FINAL DECREE PROCEEDINGS
CNR: KAUK910009502016
Next Hearing
25th April 2026
Filing Number
6/2016
Filing Date
29-07-2016
Registration No
6/2016
Registration Date
29-07-2016
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDDAPUR
Judge
531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chidananda Ganapati Hegde, Age 39, Shigehalli, Siddapur
Adv. SRI. RAJESHA PARAMESHWAR BHAT
Mahendra Ganapati Hegde, Age 46, Shigehalli, Siddapur
Respondent(s)
Laxminarayan Ganapati Hegde, Age 61, Shigehalli, Siddapur
Shridhar Ganapati Hegde, Age 59, Tyagali, Siddapur
Parameshwar Ganapati Hegde, Age 55, Now at Mavinakoppa, Yellapur
Shivanand Ganapati Hegde, Age 53, Shigehalli, Siddapur
Subhashachandra Ganapati Hegde, Age 50, Shigehalli, Siddapur
Jayanta Ganapati Hegde, Age 37, Shigehalli, Siddapur
Saraswati Kom. Ganapati Hegde, Age 83, Shigehalli, Siddapur
Devaki Krishna Bhat, Age 63, Kerekai, Sirsi
Srimati Venkatraman Hegde, Age 57, Umbalamane, Siddapur
Laxmidevi Kom. Keshav Bhat, Age 41, Salkani, Siddapur
Geeta Kom. Subhashchandra Hegde, Age 41, Shigehalli, Siddapur
Hearing History
Judge: 531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR
AWAIT REPORT
AWAIT REPORT
AWAIT REPORT
AWAIT REPORT
AWAIT REPORT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | AWAIT REPORT |
| 16-02-2026 | AWAIT REPORT |
| 30-01-2026 | AWAIT REPORT |
| 06-01-2026 | AWAIT REPORT |
| 16-12-2025 | AWAIT REPORT |
Interim Orders
Summary The court allowed three interim applications (I.A. Nos. I, II, and III) filed by the petitioners with costs of Rs. 300/-. The court condoned the six-month delay in filing applications to implead the legal representatives of deceased respondent No. 8 and set aside the abatement order against her, bringing her legal heirs (one son and two daughters) on record to continue the final decree proceedings. The petitioners were directed to file an amended petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed three interim applications (I.A. Nos. I, II, and III) filed by the petitioners with costs of Rs. 300/-. The court condoned the six-month delay in filing applications to implead the legal representatives of deceased respondent No. 8 and set aside the abatement order against her, bringing her legal heirs (one son and two daughters) on record to continue the final decree proceedings. The petitioners were directed to file an amended petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts