Annapoorna W/o Neelakant Gowda UFM A/a 75 yrs, R/at Dugadimane, Halageri Post, Siddapur Taluk vs Shrikant Neelakant Gowda, A/a 54 yrs, R/at Kumta Road, Hosur, Siddapur Shankarmata — 46/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7Rule1R/w26. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK910008712022
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
46/2022
Filing Date
12-04-2022
Registration No
46/2022
Registration Date
12-04-2022
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDDAPUR
Judge
531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Annapoorna W/o Neelakant Gowda UFM A/a 75 yrs, R/at Dugadimane, Halageri Post, Siddapur Taluk
Adv. SRI, PRADEEP MAHABALESHWAR HEGDE
Respondent(s)
Shrikant Neelakant Gowda, A/a 54 yrs, R/at Kumta Road, Hosur, Siddapur Shankarmata
Hearing History
Judge: 531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
Await mediation report
Await mediation report
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 24-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | Await mediation report |
| 02-03-2026 | Await mediation report |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS No. 46/2022 Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's application (I.A. No. III) seeking to implead Ganapathi S/o Anand Madival as Defendant No. 2 under CPC Order I, Rule 10(2). The court held that the proposed defendant is neither necessary nor a proper party since the suit is for bare injunction with a specific cause of action arising from interference by the original defendant alone, and no separate cause of action exists against the proposed defendant. The main suit proceedings continue with plaintiff's evidence scheduled for November 5, 2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS No. 46/2022 Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's application (I.A. No. III) seeking to implead Ganapathi S/o Anand Madival as Defendant No. 2 under CPC Order I, Rule 10(2). The court held that the proposed defendant is neither necessary nor a proper party since the suit is for bare injunction with a specific cause of action arising from interference by the original defendant alone, and no separate cause of action exists against the proposed defendant. The main suit proceedings continue with plaintiff's evidence scheduled for November 5, 2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts