Madava Timmappa Hegde, A/a 59 yrs, R/at Korlakai, Adukatta, Siddapur Taluk vs Umesh Manja Gouda, A/a 25 yrs, R/at Korlakai, Adukatta, Siddapur Taluk — 1/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order39Rule2AR/wSec.151. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
Misc - Civil Miscellaneous Cases
CNR: KAUK910008452022
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
Filing Number
1/2022
Filing Date
29-03-2022
Registration No
1/2022
Registration Date
29-03-2022
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDDAPUR
Judge
531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Madava Timmappa Hegde, A/a 59 yrs, R/at Korlakai, Adukatta, Siddapur Taluk
Adv. SRI. RAGHUPATI SHRIPATI HEGDE
Respondent(s)
Umesh Manja Gouda, A/a 25 yrs, R/at Korlakai, Adukatta, Siddapur Taluk
Hearing History
Judge: 531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 10-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 30-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Civil Miscellaneous Case No. 1/2022 The court, after examining witness testimony on 25-09-2024, found that a pathway (referred to as "BC road") exists on Survey No. 27/1 and has existed since 1965. The court rejected the defendant's claim of encroachment and found that the defendant illegally obstructed the pathway with concrete construction. The court concluded that the plaintiff filed the suit based on false premises regarding the pathway's non-existence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Civil Miscellaneous Case No. 1/2022 The court, after examining witness testimony on 25-09-2024, found that a pathway (referred to as "BC road") exists on Survey No. 27/1 and has existed since 1965. The court rejected the defendant's claim of encroachment and found that the defendant illegally obstructed the pathway with concrete construction. The court concluded that the plaintiff filed the suit based on false premises regarding the pathway's non-existence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts