Jayalaxmi Raghavendra Madival R/o Dombekai, Tq Siddapur vs Raghavendra G — 63/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144(1A). Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAUK910005992025

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

09th April 2026

e-Filing Number

12-08-2025

Filing Number

63/2025

Filing Date

12-08-2025

Registration No

63/2025

Registration Date

12-08-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDDAPUR

Judge

531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144(1A)

Petitioner(s)

Jayalaxmi Raghavendra Madival R/o Dombekai, Tq Siddapur

Adv. SUDARSHAN SEETARAM NAIK

Kushani Raghavendra Madival Minor Guardian Jayalaxmi

Adv. SUDARSHAN SEETARAM NAIK

Respondent(s)

Raghavendra G

Hearing History

Judge: 531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

19-02-2026

EVIDENCE

10-02-2026

OBJECTION

28-01-2026

OBJECTION

14-01-2026

OBJECTION

Interim Orders

16-10-2025
Orders

Summary: The court partially allowed the interim application filed by the petitioner (a 25-year-old woman and her 2-year-old daughter) seeking maintenance from the respondent (her husband). The court directed the respondent to pay interim maintenance of Rs. 10,000 per month to the petitioners from the date of the petition until its disposal, payable on or before the 5th of each month. The petitioner had sought Rs. 20,000 monthly, but the court awarded Rs. 10,000 considering the cost of living and financial conditions of both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court partially allowed the interim application filed by the petitioner (a 25-year-old woman and her 2-year-old daughter) seeking maintenance from the respondent (her husband). The court directed the respondent to pay interim maintenance of Rs. 10,000 per month to the petitioners from the date of the petition until its disposal, payable on or before the 5th of each month. The petitioner had sought Rs. 20,000 monthly, but the court awarded Rs. 10,000 considering the cost of living and financial conditions of both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDDAPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case