Ganapati Kanna Naik A/a 72 yrs Agriculturist R/o Kirekoda Mavinakoda Siddapur vs Venktramana Timma Naik A/a 50 yrs Agriculturist Kirekod Siddapur — 52/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26Order7R1. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK910005132019
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
Filing Number
52/2019
Filing Date
27-06-2019
Registration No
52/2019
Registration Date
27-06-2019
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDDAPUR
Judge
531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ganapati Kanna Naik A/a 72 yrs Agriculturist R/o Kirekoda Mavinakoda Siddapur
Adv. SRI. MAHENDRA RAJASHEKAR PATIL
Respondent(s)
Venktramana Timma Naik A/a 50 yrs Agriculturist Kirekod Siddapur
Gange Kom Timma Naik A/a 75 yrs Agriculturist R/o Kirekod Siddapur
Section officer, O and M Section HESCOM Bilagi Siddapur
Hearing History
Judge: 531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 24-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 17-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 09-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: In O.S. No. 52/2019, the court adjourned the case with the next hearing scheduled for 17-02-2026 for witness examination. Multiple documents were marked as evidence including property survey records (Survey Nos. 128, 130, 131, 132), HESCOM electricity bills and estimates, and a DVD. The plaintiff's counsel confirmed readiness for cross-examination, and the court proceeded to record the plaintiff's statement in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In O.S. No. 52/2019, the court adjourned the case with the next hearing scheduled for 17-02-2026 for witness examination. Multiple documents were marked as evidence including property survey records (Survey Nos. 128, 130, 131, 132), HESCOM electricity bills and estimates, and a DVD. The plaintiff's counsel confirmed readiness for cross-examination, and the court proceeded to record the plaintiff's statement in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts