Ganesh S/o Manjunath Gouda A.a 17 Yrs, Student R/at Haralikoppa, Guardian of mother Jaya kom Manj vs Eraji Yane Erajamma Kom Erappa Gouda A.a 70 Yrs R/at Haralikoppa, Akkunji, Siddapur taluk — 92/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule1. Status: AWAIT REPORT. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK910004572024
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
Filing Number
92/2024
Filing Date
05-09-2024
Registration No
92/2024
Registration Date
05-09-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDDAPUR
Judge
531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ganesh S/o Manjunath Gouda A.a 17 Yrs, Student R/at Haralikoppa, Guardian of mother Jaya kom Manj
Adv. SRI. MANJUNATH GAJANAN HEGDE
Sushmita D/o Manjunath Gouda A.a 15 Yrs R/at Haralikoppa Siddapur Guardian mother Jaya Kom Manjunath
Respondent(s)
Eraji Yane Erajamma Kom Erappa Gouda A.a 70 Yrs R/at Haralikoppa, Akkunji, Siddapur taluk
Nagaratna Kom Basavaraj Goudar A/a 38 Yrs R/at Nejjur, Siddapur taluk
Sharadamma Yane Sharada Kom Gurupadappa Gouda A.a 52 Yrs R/at Nejjur Siddapur taluk
Manjunath Erappa Gouda A/a 40 Yrs R/at Haralikoppa, Akkunji Tq Siddapur
Pandururanga Bin Marya Naik A/a 52 Yrs R/at Laxmi Nagara Hosur, Siddapur taluk
Raju Basavarajappa Gouda A.a 60 Yrs R/at Haralikoppa, Akkunji Tq siddapur
Hearing History
Judge: 531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR
AWAIT REPORT
AWAIT REPORT
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | AWAIT REPORT |
| 18-02-2026 | AWAIT REPORT |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 17-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary The Civil Judge at Siddapura granted the temporary injunction sought by the plaintiffs (two minor children) in their partition suit. The court restrained defendant No. 5 from alienating the disputed "B" schedule properties in any manner until disposal of the suit, finding that the plaintiffs established a prima-facie case, balance of convenience favored them, and irreparable loss would result if the injunction were refused. The cost of the application was ordered to follow the result of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Civil Judge at Siddapura granted the temporary injunction sought by the plaintiffs (two minor children) in their partition suit. The court restrained defendant No. 5 from alienating the disputed "B" schedule properties in any manner until disposal of the suit, finding that the plaintiffs established a prima-facie case, balance of convenience favored them, and irreparable loss would result if the injunction were refused. The cost of the application was ordered to follow the result of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts