Anvar Khan Hasan Khan A/a 63 Yrs R.at Kavanchuru Post Kavanchuru TQ Siddapur vs Rehamath Khan Hasan Khan A.a 65 Yrs R.at Haladakatta, Kondli Post Tq siddapur — 47/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule1. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAUK910003822025

SUMMONS

Next Hearing

06th July 2026

Filing Number

47/2025

Filing Date

19-06-2025

Registration No

47/2025

Registration Date

19-06-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDDAPUR

Judge

531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule1

Petitioner(s)

Anvar Khan Hasan Khan A/a 63 Yrs R.at Kavanchuru Post Kavanchuru TQ Siddapur

Adv. SRI. NARAYANA YELLAPPA APPINBAIL

Respondent(s)

Rehamath Khan Hasan Khan A.a 65 Yrs R.at Haladakatta, Kondli Post Tq siddapur

Ahammad Khan Hasan Khan A.a 67 Yrs R.at Konkeri, Padavagod village Talaguppa TQ Sagara Shivamogga District

Harnoon Khan Hasan Khan A.a 61 Yrs R./at Vidyanagar Huballi Dharwad District

Nasir Khan Hasan Khan Dead by LRs(Legal Heir)

Khadar Khan Gouse Khan A.a 61 YTrs R.at Haladakatta Post Kondli TQ Siddapur

Havabi Kom Suleman Khan A.a 68 Yrs R.at Haladakatta Post Kondli TQ Siddapur

Hearing History

Judge: 531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR

03-06-2026

SUMMONS

15-04-2026

SUMMONS

06-04-2026

For Compliance

23-03-2026

ORDERS

13-03-2026

HEARING

Interim Orders

20-06-2025
Orders
06-04-2026
Orders

Case Summary: OS.No. 47/2025 Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction and ordered both parties to bear their own costs. Key Facts: Plaintiff Anwar Khan sought temporary injunction to prevent defendants (his brothers) from interfering with his peaceful possession of jointly-held ancestral property. The plaintiff claimed the property descended from his father's will dated 05.03.1998. However, the court noted that land records showed the property stood in joint names of the plaintiff and defendants, with all parties in joint possession. Reason for Dismissal: The court found the plaintiff failed to establish grounds for temporary injunction because: (1) he cannot obtain injunction against co-possessors when he admits joint ownership; (2) a partition suit (OS.No.56/2021) between same parties was already pending, which the plaintiff suppressed; (3) no prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable injury was demonstrated. The case was adjourned to 15.04.2026 for compliance with settlement provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS.No. 47/2025 Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction and ordered both parties to bear their own costs. Key Facts: Plaintiff Anwar Khan sought temporary injunction to prevent defendants (his brothers) from interfering with his peaceful possession of jointly-held ancestral property. The plaintiff claimed the property descended from his father's will dated 05.03.1998. However, the court noted that land records showed the property stood in joint names of the plaintiff and defendants, with all parties in joint possession. Reason for Dismissal: The court found the plaintiff failed to establish grounds for temporary injunction because: (1) he cannot obtain injunction against co-possessors when he admits joint ownership; (2) a partition suit (OS.No.56/2021) between same parties was already pending, which the plaintiff suppressed; (3) no prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable injury was demonstrated. The case was adjourned to 15.04.2026 for compliance with settlement provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDDAPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case