Anvar Khan Hasan Khan A/a 63 Yrs R.at Kavanchuru Post Kavanchuru TQ Siddapur vs Rehamath Khan Hasan Khan A.a 65 Yrs R.at Haladakatta, Kondli Post Tq siddapur — 47/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule1. Status: Summons. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK910003822025
Filing Number
47/2025
Filing Date
19-Jun-2025
Registration No
47/2025
Registration Date
19-Jun-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDDAPUR
Judge
531-CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Anvar Khan Hasan Khan A/a 63 Yrs R.at Kavanchuru Post Kavanchuru TQ Siddapur
Adv. SRI. NARAYANA YELLAPPA APPINBAIL
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rehamath Khan Hasan Khan A.a 65 Yrs R.at Haladakatta, Kondli Post Tq siddapur
-
2.Ahammad Khan Hasan Khan A.a 67 Yrs R.at Konkeri, Padavagod village Talaguppa TQ Sagara Shivamogga District
-
3.Harnoon Khan Hasan Khan A.a 61 Yrs R./at Vidyanagar Huballi Dharwad District
-
4.Nasir Khan Hasan Khan Dead by LRs(Legal Heir)
-
5.Khadar Khan Gouse Khan A.a 61 YTrs R.at Haladakatta Post Kondli TQ Siddapur
-
6.Havabi Kom Suleman Khan A.a 68 Yrs R.at Haladakatta Post Kondli TQ Siddapur
Case History
-
06-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
03-Jun-2026
Summons
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
15-Apr-2026
Summons
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
06-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: OS.No. 47/2025 Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction and ordered both parties to bear their own costs. Key Facts: Plaintiff Anwar Khan sought temporary injunction to prevent defendants (his brothers) from interfering with his peaceful possession of jointly-held ancestral property. The plaintiff claimed the property descended from his father's will dated 05.03.1998. However, the court noted that land records showed the property stood in joint names of the plaintiff and defendants, with all parties in joint possession. Reason for Dismissal: The court found the plaintiff failed to establish grounds for temporary injunction because: (1) he cannot obtain injunction against co-possessors when he admits joint ownership; (2) a partition suit (OS.No.56/2021) between same parties was already pending, which the plaintiff suppressed; (3) no prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable injury was demonstrated. The case was adjourned to 15.04.2026 for compliance with settlement provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
For Compliance
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
23-Mar-2026
Orders
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
02-Mar-2026
Hearing
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
24-Feb-2026
Objection
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
10-Feb-2026
Objection
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
31-Jan-2026
Await mediation report
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
15-Dec-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
29-Nov-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
15-Nov-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
24-Oct-2025
Summons
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
27-Sep-2025
Summons
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
15-Sep-2025
Summons
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
01-Sep-2025
Summons
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
16-Aug-2025
Summons
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
29-Jul-2025
Summons
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
04-Jul-2025
Summons
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
20-Jun-2025
OrdersView PDF
-
20-Jun-2025
Summons
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
19-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 47/2025
Case Summary: OS.No. 47/2025 Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction and ordered both parties to bear their own costs. Key Facts: Plaintiff Anwar Khan sought temporary injunction to prevent defendants (his brothers) from interfering with his peaceful possession of jointly-held ancestral property. The plaintiff claimed the property descended from his father's will dated 05.03.1998. However, the court noted that land records showed the property stood in joint names of the plaintiff and defendants, with all parties in joint possession. Reason for Dismissal: The court found the plaintiff failed to establish grounds for temporary injunction because: (1) he cannot obtain injunction against co-possessors when he admits joint ownership; (2) a partition suit (OS.No.56/2021) between same parties was already pending, which the plaintiff suppressed; (3) no prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable injury was demonstrated. The case was adjourned to 15.04.2026 for compliance with settlement provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts