St. Milagres Credit Sourdha Co-Operative Ltd. Karwar Branch Siddapur vs JAFAR SADHIK ABDUL RAHIM SAB R/O HARSIKATTA SIDDAPUR — 130/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: SETTELMENT. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK910003092025

SETTELMENT

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

e-Filing Number

21-04-2025

Filing Number

53/2025

Filing Date

22-04-2025

Registration No

130/2025

Registration Date

22-04-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDDAPUR

Judge

531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

St. Milagres Credit Sourdha Co-Operative Ltd. Karwar Branch Siddapur

Adv. HEGDE MANJUNATHA G

Respondent(s)

JAFAR SADHIK ABDUL RAHIM SAB R/O HARSIKATTA SIDDAPUR

Hearing History

Judge: 531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR

21-05-2026

SETTELMENT

24-04-2026

SETTELMENT

10-04-2026

EVIDENCE

26-03-2026

EVIDENCE

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

04-08-2025
Plea
04-08-2025
313 Statement
12-01-2026
Orders

Case Summary: C.C. No. 130/2025 In this cheque bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the accused Jafar Sadhik Abdul Rahim filed an application under Section 91 Cr.P.C/Section 94 BNSS requesting the court to call for four documents: loan application, loan sanction details, loan agreement, and account statement. The court allowed the application, finding the documents necessary for the accused's defense and holding that providing them would ensure a fair trial without causing hardship to the complainant society. The court directed the complainant society's counsel to produce all four requested documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C. No. 130/2025 In this cheque bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the accused Jafar Sadhik Abdul Rahim filed an application under Section 91 Cr.P.C/Section 94 BNSS requesting the court to call for four documents: loan application, loan sanction details, loan agreement, and account statement. The court allowed the application, finding the documents necessary for the accused's defense and holding that providing them would ensure a fair trial without causing hardship to the complainant society. The court directed the complainant society's counsel to produce all four requested documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDDAPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case