Chandrashekhar Rama Bhat A/a 67 yrs Agriculturist Chatnalli Bidrakan Siddapur vs State of Karnataka R/by Deputy Commissioner. Karwar. — 33/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26Order7R1. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK910002582019
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
33/2019
Filing Date
26-03-2019
Registration No
33/2019
Registration Date
26-03-2019
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDDAPUR
Judge
531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chandrashekhar Rama Bhat A/a 67 yrs Agriculturist Chatnalli Bidrakan Siddapur
Adv. SRI GANAPATI SUBRAYA HEGDE
Respondent(s)
State of Karnataka R/by Deputy Commissioner. Karwar.
Tahasildar Siddapur
The Revenue Inspector Kondlu Hobli Siddapur
Village Panchayat, Bidrakan Rby PDO Bidrakan Siddapur, Rept. by P.D.O.
Anusuya Mahabaleshwr Bhat A/a 84 yrs Household Chatnalli Bidrakan Siddapur
Kamalakar Mahabaleshwar Bhat A/a 66 yrs Agriculture Chatnalli Bidrakan Siddapur
Dattatraya Mahabaleshwar Bhat Aa 64 yrs Agriculturist Chatnalli Bidrakan Siddapur
Balachandra Mahabaleshwar Bhat A/a 62 yrs Agriculturist Chatnalli Bidrakan Siddapur
Umapathi Mahabaleshwar Bhat A/a 60 yrs Agriculturist Chatnalli Bidrakan Siddapur
Shrikant Mahabaleshwar Bhat A/a 58 yrs Agriculture Chatnalli Bidrakan Siddapur
Hearing History
Judge: 531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 24-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 17-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 11-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 09-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary - O.S. No. 33/2019 Outcome: The court determined that both the plaintiff and defendants (5-10) have separate ownership rights over Survey No. 245 property in Bidukhan village. The plaintiff's ancestral house and the defendants' constructed house are located on separate portions of the property. The court found that the plaintiff's reconstruction of her house on the property did not constitute unauthorized construction, as she has established ownership rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary - O.S. No. 33/2019 Outcome: The court determined that both the plaintiff and defendants (5-10) have separate ownership rights over Survey No. 245 property in Bidukhan village. The plaintiff's ancestral house and the defendants' constructed house are located on separate portions of the property. The court found that the plaintiff's reconstruction of her house on the property did not constitute unauthorized construction, as she has established ownership rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts