Subray Gangadhar Bhat, A/a 60 yrs, R/at Tyagli, Hirekai, Siddapur Taluk vs Indira W/o Vishwanath Bhat, A/a 63 yrs, R/at Ganesh Co-Operative Society, Gavdevi Road, Mumbai — 16/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7Rule1R/w26. Status: OBJECTION. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK910002432021
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
Filing Number
16/2021
Filing Date
16-02-2021
Registration No
16/2021
Registration Date
16-02-2021
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDDAPUR
Judge
531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Subray Gangadhar Bhat, A/a 60 yrs, R/at Tyagli, Hirekai, Siddapur Taluk
Adv. SRI. MAHENDRA RAJASHEKAR PATIL
Respondent(s)
Indira W/o Vishwanath Bhat, A/a 63 yrs, R/at Ganesh Co-Operative Society, Gavdevi Road, Mumbai
Vinayak Vishwanath Bhat, A/a 32 yrs, R/atRoom No. 11, Ganesh Co-Operative Society, Gavdevi Road
Nisha Vishwanath Bhat, A/a 24 yrs, R/at Room No. 11, Ganesh Co-Operative Society, Gavdevi Road
Ashoka Gangadhar Bhat, A/a 56 yrs, R/at Tyagli, Hirekai, Siddapur
Geetha W/o Raju Naik, A/a 40 yrs, R/at Tyagli, Hirekai Village, Kalenalli, Siddapur
Hearing History
Judge: 531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 25-02-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 23-02-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 17-02-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 09-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: O.S. No. 16/2021 Outcome: The Civil Judge of Siddapura adjudicated a property partition dispute involving ancestral property divided in 1988. The court ruled that defendants 1-3 (children of Vishwanath Bhatt) have no rights to the disputed property (Survey No. 7/2), which belongs to the plaintiff and defendant 4 (Ashok) following the 1988 family partition agreement. The court found that defendant 1 (Vishwanath Bhatt) died in 1992, and defendants 2-3 subsequently acquired ownership of the property; defendant 5 holds possession since February 17, 2020. The petition was decided on its merits based on documentary evidence and witness testimony regarding property boundaries and ownership succession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: O.S. No. 16/2021 Outcome: The Civil Judge of Siddapura adjudicated a property partition dispute involving ancestral property divided in 1988. The court ruled that defendants 1-3 (children of Vishwanath Bhatt) have no rights to the disputed property (Survey No. 7/2), which belongs to the plaintiff and defendant 4 (Ashok) following the 1988 family partition agreement. The court found that defendant 1 (Vishwanath Bhatt) died in 1992, and defendants 2-3 subsequently acquired ownership of the property; defendant 5 holds possession since February 17, 2020. The petition was decided on its merits based on documentary evidence and witness testimony regarding property boundaries and ownership succession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts