Vitthal Rama Pai A/a 88 yrs Agriculturist Bilagi Siddapur vs Aravind Nagesh Pai A/a 47 yrs Business Bilagi Siddapur — 25/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26Order7R1. Status: OBJECTION. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK910002372019
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
Filing Number
25/2019
Filing Date
15-03-2019
Registration No
25/2019
Registration Date
15-03-2019
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDDAPUR
Judge
531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vitthal Rama Pai A/a 88 yrs Agriculturist Bilagi Siddapur
Adv. SRI GANAPATI SUBRAYA HEGDE
Pundaleek Vasudev Pai A/a 84 yrs Agriculturist Bilagi Siddapur
Vinayak Ramakant Pai A/a 45 yrs Agriuclutirst Bilagi Siddapur
Chakrapani Pandurang Pai A/a 61 yrs Agriculturist Bialagi Siddapur
Respondent(s)
Aravind Nagesh Pai A/a 47 yrs Business Bilagi Siddapur
Ajeet Nagesh Pai A/a 45 yrs Employee Bilagi Siddapur
Adarsh Nagesh Pai A.a 43 yrs Agriuclturist Bilagi Siddapur
Nagesh Vaman Pai A.a 78 yrs Agriculturist Bilagi Siddapur
Hearing History
Judge: 531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 20-02-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 10-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 30-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit, finding no merit in the claims. The court determined that the plaintiff had no valid rights to the disputed property (a 30x90 feet plot near a police station) and found that the plaintiff had filed false claims and false evidence in the case. The witness examination was completed, and the case was decided against the plaintiff based on findings that contradicted the plaintiff's submissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit, finding no merit in the claims. The court determined that the plaintiff had no valid rights to the disputed property (a 30x90 feet plot near a police station) and found that the plaintiff had filed false claims and false evidence in the case. The witness examination was completed, and the case was decided against the plaintiff based on findings that contradicted the plaintiff's submissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts