Chief Operating Officer, Tameer Co.Op. Credit Society Ltd., Ankola Uk Head office Sirsi Branch SDP vs Habibulla Amanulla Sab Savanur R/at Haladakatta Post Kondli Siddapur Now at Vajapeyi Nagar Siddapur — 10/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21rule11. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 25th April 2026.

EX - Execution Petition Under Order

CNR: KAUK910001442025

Case disposed

Filing Number

10/2025

Filing Date

22-01-2025

Registration No

10/2025

Registration Date

22-01-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDDAPUR

Judge

531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR

Decision Date

25th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 21rule11

Petitioner(s)

Chief Operating Officer, Tameer Co.Op. Credit Society Ltd., Ankola Uk Head office Sirsi Branch SDP

Adv. SRI. KAMALAKAR GANAPA. NAIK

Respondent(s)

Habibulla Amanulla Sab Savanur R/at Haladakatta Post Kondli Siddapur Now at Vajapeyi Nagar Siddapur

T K Azudh R/at Haladakatta Post Kondli Tq Siddapur

Smt. Shahinabanu Habibulla Sab Savanur R/at Vajapeyi Nagar Post Kondli Tq Siddapur

Hearing History

Judge: 531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR

25-04-2026

Disposed

22-04-2026

STEPS

01-04-2026

AMW

13-03-2026

AMW

21-02-2026

AMW

Final Orders / Judgements

25-04-2026
Orders

The court dismissed Tameer Co-Op. Credit Society's execution petition seeking enforcement of a Cooperative Registrar's award (Dispute No. 1646 of 2023-2024) against the respondents. The dismissal was ordered due to the petitioner's repeated absence from hearings since 2025, failure to proceed with the case, unexecuted notices and writs against defendants, and lack of grounds for adjournment, invoking CPC Orders 9 and 17. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed Tameer Co-Op. Credit Society's execution petition seeking enforcement of a Cooperative Registrar's award (Dispute No. 1646 of 2023-2024) against the respondents. The dismissal was ordered due to the petitioner's repeated absence from hearings since 2025, failure to proceed with the case, unexecuted notices and writs against defendants, and lack of grounds for adjournment, invoking CPC Orders 9 and 17. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDDAPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case