Jaya W/o Manjunath Goudar, A/a 38 yrs, R/at Haralikoppa, Akkanji, Siddapur Taluk vs Manjunath S/o Irappa Goudar, A/a 45 yrs, R/at Haralikoppa, Akkanji, Siddapur Taluk — 27/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7Rule1R/wsec.26. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK910000662024
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
27/2024
Filing Date
04-03-2024
Registration No
27/2024
Registration Date
04-03-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDDAPUR
Judge
531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jaya W/o Manjunath Goudar, A/a 38 yrs, R/at Haralikoppa, Akkanji, Siddapur Taluk
Adv. SRI. MANJUNATH GAJANAN HEGDE
Ganesh S/o Manjunath Goudra, R/a 17 yrs, Siddapur,Natural Guardian Mother, Jaya W/o Manjunath Goudar
Sushmita D/o Manjunath Goudar A/a 15 yr, Siddapur Natural Guardian Mother, Jaya W/o Manjunath Goudar
Respondent(s)
Manjunath S/o Irappa Goudar, A/a 45 yrs, R/at Haralikoppa, Akkanji, Siddapur Taluk
Hearing History
Judge: 531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
Await mediation report
Await mediation report
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 25-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | Await mediation report |
| 02-03-2026 | Await mediation report |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. No. 27/2024 The Civil Judge at Siddapur granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendant from alienating or creating charges over disputed ancestral properties. The court found the plaintiffs (wife and two minor children) established a prima facie case regarding their rights to properties that fell to the defendant's share in a 2023 family partition, and determined the balance of convenience favored the injunction to prevent irreparable harm pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. No. 27/2024 The Civil Judge at Siddapur granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendant from alienating or creating charges over disputed ancestral properties. The court found the plaintiffs (wife and two minor children) established a prima facie case regarding their rights to properties that fell to the defendant's share in a 2023 family partition, and determined the balance of convenience favored the injunction to prevent irreparable harm pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts