Raju Timma Naik A.a 55 Yrs R.at Soragala Kamsale village Tq Siddapur UK vs Sripati Mastya Naik A.a 48 Yrs R.at Kodigadde village Kodigadde Tq Siddapur UK — 3/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule1. Status: Await mediation report. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK910000092025
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
Filing Number
3/2025
Filing Date
07-01-2025
Registration No
3/2025
Registration Date
07-01-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDDAPUR
Judge
531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Raju Timma Naik A.a 55 Yrs R.at Soragala Kamsale village Tq Siddapur UK
Adv. SRI. NARAYANA YELLAPPA APPINBAIL
Respondent(s)
Sripati Mastya Naik A.a 48 Yrs R.at Kodigadde village Kodigadde Tq Siddapur UK
Hearing History
Judge: 531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR
Await mediation report
Await mediation report
Await mediation report
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Await mediation report |
| 17-02-2026 | Await mediation report |
| 31-01-2026 | Await mediation report |
| 12-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 16-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary The Civil Judge & JMFC Court at Siddapura allowed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of CPC on June 26, 2025. The court restrained the defendant from interfering with or obstructing the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property (land in Kodigadde Village) until disposal of the main suit, finding that the plaintiff established a prima-facie case, balance of convenience favored him, and he would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction was refused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Civil Judge & JMFC Court at Siddapura allowed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of CPC on June 26, 2025. The court restrained the defendant from interfering with or obstructing the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property (land in Kodigadde Village) until disposal of the main suit, finding that the plaintiff established a prima-facie case, balance of convenience favored him, and he would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction was refused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts