Pratibha Mohandas Chandraghatagi A/a 60 Yrs R.at Siddapur Kasaba Ganapati galli. vs Ganesh Narasimha Shet A.a 35 Yrs R.at Rajamarga Siddapur — 2/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule1. Status: Await mediation report. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK910000082025
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
Filing Number
2/2025
Filing Date
07-01-2025
Registration No
2/2025
Registration Date
07-01-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDDAPUR
Judge
531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pratibha Mohandas Chandraghatagi A/a 60 Yrs R.at Siddapur Kasaba Ganapati galli.
Adv. Rama S Joshi
Respondent(s)
Ganesh Narasimha Shet A.a 35 Yrs R.at Rajamarga Siddapur
Ravi Manjunath Gondali A/a 35 Yrs R.at Rajmarga Siddapur
Hearing History
Judge: 531-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. and JMFC SIDDAPUR
Await mediation report
Await mediation report
Await mediation report
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Await mediation report |
| 18-02-2026 | Await mediation report |
| 03-02-2026 | Await mediation report |
| 19-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Outcome: Both interim applications (IA No.1 & 2) filed by the plaintiff seeking temporary injunction were dismissed by the Civil Judge at Siddapura on November 19, 2025. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, the balance of convenience favored the defendants (who hold a registered sale deed from March 2022), and no irreparable loss would result from denying the injunction. Costs shall follow the result of the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Outcome: Both interim applications (IA No.1 & 2) filed by the plaintiff seeking temporary injunction were dismissed by the Civil Judge at Siddapura on November 19, 2025. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, the balance of convenience favored the defendants (who hold a registered sale deed from March 2022), and no irreparable loss would result from denying the injunction. Costs shall follow the result of the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts