Pratibha Mohandas Chandraghatagi A/a 60 Yrs R.at Siddapur Kasaba Ganapati galli. vs Ganesh Narasimha Shet A.a 35 Yrs R.at Rajamarga Siddapur — 2/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule1. Status: Await mediation report. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK910000082025
Filing Number
2/2025
Filing Date
07-Jan-2025
Registration No
2/2025
Registration Date
07-Jan-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDDAPUR
Judge
531-CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
Last updated 19-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pratibha Mohandas Chandraghatagi A/a 60 Yrs R.at Siddapur Kasaba Ganapati galli.
Adv. Rama S Joshi
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ganesh Narasimha Shet A.a 35 Yrs R.at Rajamarga Siddapur
-
2.Ravi Manjunath Gondali A/a 35 Yrs R.at Rajmarga Siddapur
Case History
-
17-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Await mediation report
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
18-Feb-2026
Await mediation report
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
03-Feb-2026
Await mediation report
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
19-Jan-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
08-Dec-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
01-Dec-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
27-Nov-2025
For Compliance
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
19-Nov-2025
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary Outcome: Both interim applications (IA No.1 & 2) filed by the plaintiff seeking temporary injunction were dismissed by the Civil Judge at Siddapura on November 19, 2025. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, the balance of convenience favored the defendants (who hold a registered sale deed from March 2022), and no irreparable loss would result from denying the injunction. Costs shall follow the result of the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Nov-2025
For Compliance
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
18-Nov-2025
Orders
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
07-Nov-2025
Hearing On IA
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
28-Oct-2025
Hearing On IA
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
17-Oct-2025
Hearing On IA
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
08-Oct-2025
Hearing On IA
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
22-Sep-2025
Hearing On IA
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
16-Sep-2025
Hearing On IA
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
09-Sep-2025
Hearing On IA
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
08-Sep-2025
Hearing On IA
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
30-Aug-2025
Hearing On IA
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
18-Aug-2025
Hearing On IA
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
04-Aug-2025
Hearing On IA
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
22-Jul-2025
Hearing On IA
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
15-Jul-2025
Hearing On IA
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
05-Jul-2025
Hearing On IA
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
27-Jun-2025
Hearing On IA
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
19-Jun-2025
Hearing On IA
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
16-Jun-2025
Hearing On IA
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
21-Apr-2025
IssueView PDF
-
21-Apr-2025
Hearing On IA
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
09-Apr-2025
Issues
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
10-Mar-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
21-Jan-2025
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
09-Jan-2025
Notice
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
08-Jan-2025
Notice
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Siddapur
-
07-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2/2025
Case Summary Outcome: Both interim applications (IA No.1 & 2) filed by the plaintiff seeking temporary injunction were dismissed by the Civil Judge at Siddapura on November 19, 2025. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, the balance of convenience favored the defendants (who hold a registered sale deed from March 2022), and no irreparable loss would result from denying the injunction. Costs shall follow the result of the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts