Ratnakka Pundalik Nalage vs Ramesh Fakkirappa Valmiki — 192/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223. Status: Sworn Statement. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.

P.C.R. - PRIVATE COMPLAINTS

CNR: KAUK810010472025

Sworn Statement

Next Hearing

04th April 2026

Filing Number

192/2025

Filing Date

21-08-2025

Registration No

192/2025

Registration Date

21-08-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUNDGOD

Judge

530-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MUNDGOD

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223

Petitioner(s)

Ratnakka Pundalik Nalage

Adv. Gudusab M Bommigatti

Respondent(s)

Ramesh Fakkirappa Valmiki

Hearing History

Judge: 530-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MUNDGOD

06-03-2026

Sworn Statement

21-02-2026

Sworn Statement

31-01-2026

Sworn Statement

07-01-2026

Sworn Statement

09-12-2025

Sworn Statement

Interim Orders

03-10-2025
Deposition

This is a Kannada language court order from Mundgod Court (Case No. 192/2025, Civil Case 01). The witness (Pundhalik, age 40, laborer) testified on 03.10.2025 regarding a land dispute where the accused allegedly operated a tractor on his field when crops were 15 days old, destroying them approximately 4 months prior. The witness stated he initially couldn't file an FIR, but after meeting the District Magistrate and police, a complaint was registered. Three documents were marked as exhibits (Ni.1, Ni.2, Ni.3). The court granted the defense counsel additional time to continue the witness examination, which was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a Kannada language court order from Mundgod Court (Case No. 192/2025, Civil Case 01). The witness (Pundhalik, age 40, laborer) testified on 03.10.2025 regarding a land dispute where the accused allegedly operated a tractor on his field when crops were 15 days old, destroying them approximately 4 months prior. The witness stated he initially couldn't file an FIR, but after meeting the District Magistrate and police, a complaint was registered. Three documents were marked as exhibits (Ni.1, Ni.2, Ni.3). The court granted the defense counsel additional time to continue the witness examination, which was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUNDGOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case