Ratnakka Pundalik Nalage vs Ramesh Fakkirappa Valmiki — 192/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223. Status: Sworn Statement. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.
P.C.R. - PRIVATE COMPLAINTS
CNR: KAUK810010472025
Next Hearing
04th April 2026
Filing Number
192/2025
Filing Date
21-08-2025
Registration No
192/2025
Registration Date
21-08-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUNDGOD
Judge
530-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MUNDGOD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ratnakka Pundalik Nalage
Adv. Gudusab M Bommigatti
Respondent(s)
Ramesh Fakkirappa Valmiki
Hearing History
Judge: 530-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MUNDGOD
Sworn Statement
Sworn Statement
Sworn Statement
Sworn Statement
Sworn Statement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Sworn Statement |
| 21-02-2026 | Sworn Statement |
| 31-01-2026 | Sworn Statement |
| 07-01-2026 | Sworn Statement |
| 09-12-2025 | Sworn Statement |
Interim Orders
This is a Kannada language court order from Mundgod Court (Case No. 192/2025, Civil Case 01). The witness (Pundhalik, age 40, laborer) testified on 03.10.2025 regarding a land dispute where the accused allegedly operated a tractor on his field when crops were 15 days old, destroying them approximately 4 months prior. The witness stated he initially couldn't file an FIR, but after meeting the District Magistrate and police, a complaint was registered. Three documents were marked as exhibits (Ni.1, Ni.2, Ni.3). The court granted the defense counsel additional time to continue the witness examination, which was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Kannada language court order from Mundgod Court (Case No. 192/2025, Civil Case 01). The witness (Pundhalik, age 40, laborer) testified on 03.10.2025 regarding a land dispute where the accused allegedly operated a tractor on his field when crops were 15 days old, destroying them approximately 4 months prior. The witness stated he initially couldn't file an FIR, but after meeting the District Magistrate and police, a complaint was registered. Three documents were marked as exhibits (Ni.1, Ni.2, Ni.3). The court granted the defense counsel additional time to continue the witness examination, which was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts