Smt. Prema W/o. Ravi Kumbar vs Sri. Basappa S/o. Annappa Kumbar — 112/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,1. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAUK810009192023

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

09th April 2026

Filing Number

112/2023

Filing Date

30-10-2023

Registration No

112/2023

Registration Date

30-10-2023

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUNDGOD

Judge

530-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MUNDGOD

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,1

Petitioner(s)

Smt. Prema W/o. Ravi Kumbar

Adv. Shri. Mohamad Salim A. Nandikatti.

Respondent(s)

Sri. Basappa S/o. Annappa Kumbar

Sri. Suresh S/o. Annappa Kumbar

Sri. Shivaputra S/o. Annappa Kumbar

Sri. Ravi S/o. Annappa Kumbar

Sri. Prakash S/o. Annappa Kumbar

Sri. Jagadish S/o. Annappa Kumbar

Hearing History

Judge: 530-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MUNDGOD

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

07-02-2026

EVIDENCE

18-12-2025

EVIDENCE

15-11-2025

EVIDENCE

23-10-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

26-03-2025
Issue
28-08-2025
Deposition
25-09-2025
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition

Summary This is a civil property dispute case (Original Case No. 112/2023) heard on 06.03.2026. The court examined witness testimony regarding ownership claims to agricultural land (Survey Nos. 19 and 154) and found significant credibility issues with the plaintiff's case, including inconsistencies in documentation, questionable witness testimony, and allegations of fabricated evidence. The court dismissed the plaintiff's claims, finding that defendants 1-3, 5, and 6 have valid ownership rights to the disputed property, and rejected the plaintiff's attempts to exclude them or challenge the registered ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a civil property dispute case (Original Case No. 112/2023) heard on 06.03.2026. The court examined witness testimony regarding ownership claims to agricultural land (Survey Nos. 19 and 154) and found significant credibility issues with the plaintiff's case, including inconsistencies in documentation, questionable witness testimony, and allegations of fabricated evidence. The court dismissed the plaintiff's claims, finding that defendants 1-3, 5, and 6 have valid ownership rights to the disputed property, and rejected the plaintiff's attempts to exclude them or challenge the registered ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUNDGOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case