Smt. Prema W/o. Ravi Kumbar vs Sri. Basappa S/o. Annappa Kumbar — 112/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,1. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK810009192023
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
Filing Number
112/2023
Filing Date
30-10-2023
Registration No
112/2023
Registration Date
30-10-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUNDGOD
Judge
530-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MUNDGOD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. Prema W/o. Ravi Kumbar
Adv. Shri. Mohamad Salim A. Nandikatti.
Respondent(s)
Sri. Basappa S/o. Annappa Kumbar
Sri. Suresh S/o. Annappa Kumbar
Sri. Shivaputra S/o. Annappa Kumbar
Sri. Ravi S/o. Annappa Kumbar
Sri. Prakash S/o. Annappa Kumbar
Sri. Jagadish S/o. Annappa Kumbar
Hearing History
Judge: 530-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MUNDGOD
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 07-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 18-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 15-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 23-10-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a civil property dispute case (Original Case No. 112/2023) heard on 06.03.2026. The court examined witness testimony regarding ownership claims to agricultural land (Survey Nos. 19 and 154) and found significant credibility issues with the plaintiff's case, including inconsistencies in documentation, questionable witness testimony, and allegations of fabricated evidence. The court dismissed the plaintiff's claims, finding that defendants 1-3, 5, and 6 have valid ownership rights to the disputed property, and rejected the plaintiff's attempts to exclude them or challenge the registered ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a civil property dispute case (Original Case No. 112/2023) heard on 06.03.2026. The court examined witness testimony regarding ownership claims to agricultural land (Survey Nos. 19 and 154) and found significant credibility issues with the plaintiff's case, including inconsistencies in documentation, questionable witness testimony, and allegations of fabricated evidence. The court dismissed the plaintiff's claims, finding that defendants 1-3, 5, and 6 have valid ownership rights to the disputed property, and rejected the plaintiff's attempts to exclude them or challenge the registered ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts