Sri. Nagaraj Parasappa Antal vs Sri. Mushtaque I Yallapur — 275/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED. Next hearing: 17th August 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK810007992024
Next Hearing
17th August 2026
Filing Number
275/2024
Filing Date
05-11-2024
Registration No
275/2024
Registration Date
05-11-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUNDGOD
Judge
530-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MUNDGOD
FIR Details
Police Station
MUNDGOD PS
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sri. Nagaraj Parasappa Antal
Adv. Shri. Raghavendra M. Malagikar
Respondent(s)
Sri. Mushtaque I Yallapur
Hearing History
Judge: 530-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MUNDGOD
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
Await report
A.D.R.
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-06-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
| 28-04-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
| 13-03-2026 | Await report |
| 06-02-2026 | A.D.R. |
| 30-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 275/2024 A criminal case under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 (cheque dishonour) was filed by petitioner Nagaraj Parasappa Antal against respondent Mushtaque I Yallapur. The respondent had allegedly borrowed ₹2,00,000 on 20-09-2022 with a promise to repay by cheque dated 11-03-2024, which was subsequently dishonoured on 14-03-2024 due to insufficient funds. The case was in the examination phase; the respondent was questioned about the charges and asked whether he accepted them or wished to contest them through trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 275/2024 A criminal case under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 (cheque dishonour) was filed by petitioner Nagaraj Parasappa Antal against respondent Mushtaque I Yallapur. The respondent had allegedly borrowed ₹2,00,000 on 20-09-2022 with a promise to repay by cheque dated 11-03-2024, which was subsequently dishonoured on 14-03-2024 due to insufficient funds. The case was in the examination phase; the respondent was questioned about the charges and asked whether he accepted them or wished to contest them through trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts