Saiyyed Jul Kafeel S/o. Saiyed Mahammad Rafik Inamadar vs Suresh S/o. Arjun Kullolli — 433/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: SETTLEMENT. Next hearing: 19th August 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK810006632025
Next Hearing
19th August 2026
Filing Number
116/2025
Filing Date
17-06-2025
Registration No
433/2025
Registration Date
17-06-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUNDGOD
Judge
530-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MUNDGOD
FIR Details
Police Station
MUNDGOD PS
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Saiyyed Jul Kafeel S/o. Saiyed Mahammad Rafik Inamadar
Adv. Shri. Mohamad Salim A. Nandikatti.
Respondent(s)
Suresh S/o. Arjun Kullolli
Hearing History
Judge: 530-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MUNDGOD
SETTLEMENT
SETTLEMENT
SETTLEMENT
FOR PAYMENT
SETTLEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-06-2026 | SETTLEMENT |
| 04-05-2026 | SETTLEMENT |
| 28-03-2026 | SETTLEMENT |
| 14-03-2026 | FOR PAYMENT |
| 13-03-2026 | SETTLEMENT |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 433/2025 In this civil case from Mundgod Civil Court, petitioner Saiyyed Jul Kafeel accused respondent Suresh (an ACF in the Forest Department) of fraudulently obtaining ₹9,60,000 as a loan by pledging the petitioner's mother's gold ornaments to a cooperative society without authorization. The respondent issued a cheque (No. 275938 dated 11-04-2025) for repayment, but it bounced on 17-04-2025 due to insufficient funds. The court examined the respondent regarding charges under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, and recorded his response to the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 433/2025 In this civil case from Mundgod Civil Court, petitioner Saiyyed Jul Kafeel accused respondent Suresh (an ACF in the Forest Department) of fraudulently obtaining ₹9,60,000 as a loan by pledging the petitioner's mother's gold ornaments to a cooperative society without authorization. The respondent issued a cheque (No. 275938 dated 11-04-2025) for repayment, but it bounced on 17-04-2025 due to insufficient funds. The court examined the respondent regarding charges under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, and recorded his response to the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts