Smt. Neelavva W/o. Fakkirswami Harijan, 32 Yrs., Agril., Household, R/o. Salgaon, Mundgod U.K. vs Sri. Chandrashekhar Peddanna Bhovi, 55 Yrs., Agril., R/o. Laxmeshwar, Shirhatti, Gadag. — 34/2019
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 R/w Sec. 26 of Cpc. Status: Objection. Next hearing: 28th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK810005702019
Next Hearing
28th March 2026
Filing Number
34/2019
Filing Date
26-06-2019
Registration No
34/2019
Registration Date
27-06-2019
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUNDGOD
Judge
530-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MUNDGOD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. Neelavva W/o. Fakkirswami Harijan, 32 Yrs., Agril., Household, R/o. Salgaon, Mundgod U.K.
Adv. Shri. Guddappa Shivanagappa Katur.
Smt. Kusuma W/o. Fakkirswami Harijan, 30 Yrs., Agril., and Household, R/o. Salagaon, Mundgod.
Respondent(s)
Sri. Chandrashekhar Peddanna Bhovi, 55 Yrs., Agril., R/o. Laxmeshwar, Shirhatti, Gadag.
Hearing History
Judge: 530-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MUNDGOD
Objection
ISSUES
ORDERS
HEARING
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Objection |
| 28-02-2026 | ISSUES |
| 23-02-2026 | ORDERS |
| 21-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 13-02-2026 | ORDERS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: O.S. No. 34/2019, Civil Judge & JMFC, Mundgod, Uttara Kannada Date: 28 February 2026 Outcome: The court dismissed the defendants' application seeking rejection of the plaint on limitation grounds. The suit for specific performance of a 2008 sale agreement, filed in 2019 (after ~10 years), was held to involve a mixed question of law and fact regarding limitation, requiring full trial rather than threshold rejection. The court found time was not essential to the contract and factual determination was necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: O.S. No. 34/2019, Civil Judge & JMFC, Mundgod, Uttara Kannada Date: 28 February 2026 Outcome: The court dismissed the defendants' application seeking rejection of the plaint on limitation grounds. The suit for specific performance of a 2008 sale agreement, filed in 2019 (after ~10 years), was held to involve a mixed question of law and fact regarding limitation, requiring full trial rather than threshold rejection. The court found time was not essential to the contract and factual determination was necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts