The State Mundgod Police station Mundgod vs Varuna Yane Omkar Basavaraj Gadag — 255/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 132,121(1),118(1),109,3(5). Status: Appearance Of Accussed. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK810005622025
e-Filing Number
05-05-2025
Filing Number
244/2025
Filing Date
05-May-2025
Registration No
255/2025
Registration Date
05-May-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUNDGOD
Judge
530-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court Mundgod
Last updated 19-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State Mundgod Police station Mundgod
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
-
1.Varuna Yane Omkar Basavaraj Gadag
-
2.Nakshatra Mutturaj Gurunath Jakkali
Adv. null
-
3.Tanu Yane Hussainbaig Mehabub Savanoor
Adv. null
-
4.Sanama Yane Imaransahil Javed Davanagere Makandar
Adv. null
-
5.Preeti Mahammed Asif Mabusab Shyadagupii
Adv. null
-
6.Janaki Manoj Sudarshan Hanchati
Adv. null
Case History
-
22-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Appearance Of Accussed
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court Mundgod
-
30-Jan-2026
Appearance Of Accussed
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court Mundgod
-
14-Jan-2026
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court Mundgod
-
07-Jan-2026
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court Mundgod
-
03-Dec-2025
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court Mundgod
-
29-Oct-2025
For Hbc
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court Mundgod
-
27-Oct-2025
Compliance
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court Mundgod
-
18-Oct-2025
Compliance
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court Mundgod
-
14-Oct-2025
Compliance
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court Mundgod
-
08-Oct-2025
Objection
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court Mundgod
-
22-Aug-2025
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: CC 255/2025 Outcome: Bail granted to accused nos. 1-3, 5, and 6 under Section 480 B.N.S.S. The court held that although the alleged offences (under Sections 132, 121(1), 118(1), 109, and 3(5) BNS) are non-bailable, they are not punishable by death or life imprisonment, and prosecution's apprehensions about witness intimidation or absconding can be addressed through stringent bail conditions. The court applied the cardinal rule that "bail is a rule and jail is an exception," rejecting pretrial detention and upholding the presumption of innocence. Conditions: Each accused must execute a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties, appear regularly in court, not threaten witnesses, tamper evidence, or contact the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Aug-2025
For Hbc
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court Mundgod
-
18-Aug-2025
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court Mundgod
-
13-Aug-2025
Objection
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court Mundgod
-
03-Jul-2025
Summons
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court Mundgod
-
05-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 255/2025
Case Summary: CC 255/2025 Outcome: Bail granted to accused nos. 1-3, 5, and 6 under Section 480 B.N.S.S. The court held that although the alleged offences (under Sections 132, 121(1), 118(1), 109, and 3(5) BNS) are non-bailable, they are not punishable by death or life imprisonment, and prosecution's apprehensions about witness intimidation or absconding can be addressed through stringent bail conditions. The court applied the cardinal rule that "bail is a rule and jail is an exception," rejecting pretrial detention and upholding the presumption of innocence. Conditions: Each accused must execute a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties, appear regularly in court, not threaten witnesses, tamper evidence, or contact the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts