The State Mundgod Police station Mundgod vs Varuna Yane Omkar Basavaraj Gadag — 255/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 132,121(1),118(1),109,3(5). Status: APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK810005622025

APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED

Next Hearing

22nd April 2026

e-Filing Number

05-05-2025

Filing Number

244/2025

Filing Date

05-05-2025

Registration No

255/2025

Registration Date

05-05-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUNDGOD

Judge

530-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MUNDGOD

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 132,121(1),118(1),109,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

The State Mundgod Police station Mundgod

Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

Varuna Yane Omkar Basavaraj Gadag

Nakshatra Mutturaj Gurunath Jakkali

Adv. null

Tanu Yane Hussainbaig Mehabub Savanoor

Adv. null

Sanama Yane Imaransahil Javed Davanagere Makandar

Adv. null

Preeti Mahammed Asif Mabusab Shyadagupii

Adv. null

Janaki Manoj Sudarshan Hanchati

Adv. null

Hearing History

Judge: 530-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MUNDGOD

06-03-2026

APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED

30-01-2026

APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED

14-01-2026

FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA

07-01-2026

FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA

03-12-2025

FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA

Interim Orders

22-08-2025
Orders

Case Summary: CC 255/2025 Outcome: Bail granted to accused nos. 1-3, 5, and 6 under Section 480 B.N.S.S. The court held that although the alleged offences (under Sections 132, 121(1), 118(1), 109, and 3(5) BNS) are non-bailable, they are not punishable by death or life imprisonment, and prosecution's apprehensions about witness intimidation or absconding can be addressed through stringent bail conditions. The court applied the cardinal rule that "bail is a rule and jail is an exception," rejecting pretrial detention and upholding the presumption of innocence. Conditions: Each accused must execute a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties, appear regularly in court, not threaten witnesses, tamper evidence, or contact the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 255/2025 Outcome: Bail granted to accused nos. 1-3, 5, and 6 under Section 480 B.N.S.S. The court held that although the alleged offences (under Sections 132, 121(1), 118(1), 109, and 3(5) BNS) are non-bailable, they are not punishable by death or life imprisonment, and prosecution's apprehensions about witness intimidation or absconding can be addressed through stringent bail conditions. The court applied the cardinal rule that "bail is a rule and jail is an exception," rejecting pretrial detention and upholding the presumption of innocence. Conditions: Each accused must execute a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties, appear regularly in court, not threaten witnesses, tamper evidence, or contact the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUNDGOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case