The State Mundgod Police station Mundgod vs Varuna Yane Omkar Basavaraj Gadag — 255/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 132,121(1),118(1),109,3(5). Status: APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK810005622025
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
05-05-2025
Filing Number
244/2025
Filing Date
05-05-2025
Registration No
255/2025
Registration Date
05-05-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUNDGOD
Judge
530-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MUNDGOD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State Mundgod Police station Mundgod
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Varuna Yane Omkar Basavaraj Gadag
Nakshatra Mutturaj Gurunath Jakkali
Adv. null
Tanu Yane Hussainbaig Mehabub Savanoor
Adv. null
Sanama Yane Imaransahil Javed Davanagere Makandar
Adv. null
Preeti Mahammed Asif Mabusab Shyadagupii
Adv. null
Janaki Manoj Sudarshan Hanchati
Adv. null
Hearing History
Judge: 530-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MUNDGOD
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA
FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA
FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
| 30-01-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
| 14-01-2026 | FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA |
| 07-01-2026 | FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA |
| 03-12-2025 | FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC 255/2025 Outcome: Bail granted to accused nos. 1-3, 5, and 6 under Section 480 B.N.S.S. The court held that although the alleged offences (under Sections 132, 121(1), 118(1), 109, and 3(5) BNS) are non-bailable, they are not punishable by death or life imprisonment, and prosecution's apprehensions about witness intimidation or absconding can be addressed through stringent bail conditions. The court applied the cardinal rule that "bail is a rule and jail is an exception," rejecting pretrial detention and upholding the presumption of innocence. Conditions: Each accused must execute a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties, appear regularly in court, not threaten witnesses, tamper evidence, or contact the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 255/2025 Outcome: Bail granted to accused nos. 1-3, 5, and 6 under Section 480 B.N.S.S. The court held that although the alleged offences (under Sections 132, 121(1), 118(1), 109, and 3(5) BNS) are non-bailable, they are not punishable by death or life imprisonment, and prosecution's apprehensions about witness intimidation or absconding can be addressed through stringent bail conditions. The court applied the cardinal rule that "bail is a rule and jail is an exception," rejecting pretrial detention and upholding the presumption of innocence. Conditions: Each accused must execute a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties, appear regularly in court, not threaten witnesses, tamper evidence, or contact the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts