Sri. Bhagu S/o. Janu Dhanagaragouli yane Varak, 48 Yrs., Watchman, R/o. Taggihall, Po. Bhagavati, T vs Sri. Bairu S/o. Malu Dhanagaragouli yane Varak, 80 Yrs., Agril., R/o. Yarebail, Mundgod. U.K. — 40/2018
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 R/w Sec. 26 of Cpc. Status: FOR STEPS. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK810003992018
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
Filing Number
40/2018
Filing Date
06-07-2018
Registration No
40/2018
Registration Date
06-07-2018
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUNDGOD
Judge
530-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MUNDGOD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sri. Bhagu S/o. Janu Dhanagaragouli yane Varak, 48 Yrs., Watchman, R/o. Taggihall, Po. Bhagavati, T
Adv. Smt. Annapoorna S.S., Bhat.
Sri. Janu S/o. Jimmu Dhanagargouli, yane varak, 21 Yrs.,Coolie, T/o Tattihalla, Haliyal.
Sri. Bharata S/o. Jimmu Dhanagargouli yane Varak, 19 yrs., Student, Tattihall, Haliyala.
Respondent(s)
Sri. Bairu S/o. Malu Dhanagaragouli yane Varak, 80 Yrs., Agril., R/o. Yarebail, Mundgod. U.K.
Sri. Vittu S/o. Vaghu Dhanagaragouli yane Varak, 45 Yrs. Agril., R/o. Yarebail, Mundgod.
Smri. Bhoru S/o. Vagu Dhanagargouli yane Varak, 41 Yrs., Agril., R/o. Yarebail, Mundgod.
Sri. Malu S/o.V agu Dhanagargouli yane varak, 39 Yrs., Agril., R/o. Yarebail, Mundgod.
Sri. Bapu S/o. Vagu Dhangaragouli yane Vark, 37 Yrs., Agril., R/o. Yarebail, Mundgod.
Sri. Dhondu S/o. Vagu dhanagaragouli yane Varak, 35 Yrs., Agril., R/o. Yarebail, Mundgod.
Smt. Rahimbi W/o. Mahaboobasab Mulla, 65 Yrs., Agril., R/o. Kendalageri, Mundgod.
Sri. Sailani S/o. Mahaboobasab Mulla, 43 Yrs., Agril., R/o. Kendlageri, Mundgod.
Nagubayi Kom Vagu Dhanagara Gouli Yane Varak, 65 yrs, R/o. Yarebail, Mundgod, U.K.
Hearing History
Judge: 530-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MUNDGOD
FOR STEPS
DEFENCE EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | FOR STEPS |
| 13-02-2026 | DEFENCE EVIDENCE |
| 04-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 23-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 18-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
The case (Original Suit No. 40/2018) concerns a property purchase dispute. The court examined witness testimony dated 13.02.2026 regarding whether the defendant was the actual seller at the time of transaction, and reviewed documentary evidence including identification documents and bank loan records related to an SBI bank loan. The court found insufficient evidence and dismissed the case, ruling that no further inquiry was necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The case (Original Suit No. 40/2018) concerns a property purchase dispute. The court examined witness testimony dated 13.02.2026 regarding whether the defendant was the actual seller at the time of transaction, and reviewed documentary evidence including identification documents and bank loan records related to an SBI bank loan. The court found insufficient evidence and dismissed the case, ruling that no further inquiry was necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts