Sharadha W/o. Narayan Naik. vs Praveen S/o. Prakash Bhasme. — 51/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,1,26. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK810003282023
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
52/2023
Filing Date
16-06-2023
Registration No
51/2023
Registration Date
17-06-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUNDGOD
Judge
530-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MUNDGOD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sharadha W/o. Narayan Naik.
Adv. Smt. Annapoorna S.S., Bhat.
Harish S/o. Narayan Naik.
Respondent(s)
Praveen S/o. Prakash Bhasme.
Prashanth S/o. Prakash Bhasme.
Sandeep S/o. Prakash Bhasme
Hearing History
Judge: 530-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MUNDGOD
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 17-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 01-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case 51/2023 Summary: This is a property dispute case heard on 16.08.2025 before the Civil Judge at Mudgod. The petitioners (Sharadha and Harish) are challenging the respondents' (Praveen, Prashanth, and Sandeep Bhasme) actions regarding a disputed property. The core issue involves competing claims over land boundaries, access roads, and ownership rights to Survey No. 10/2. The petitioners claim they purchased the property in 1998 and maintain possession, while respondents contest their right of way and have allegedly obstructed access. The court examined witness testimony, survey documents, and boundary demarcations. The judgment finds that the right-of-way road through Survey No. 9 belongs to the petitioners and dismisses the respondents' objections regarding property encroachment and access obstruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 51/2023 Summary: This is a property dispute case heard on 16.08.2025 before the Civil Judge at Mudgod. The petitioners (Sharadha and Harish) are challenging the respondents' (Praveen, Prashanth, and Sandeep Bhasme) actions regarding a disputed property. The core issue involves competing claims over land boundaries, access roads, and ownership rights to Survey No. 10/2. The petitioners claim they purchased the property in 1998 and maintain possession, while respondents contest their right of way and have allegedly obstructed access. The court examined witness testimony, survey documents, and boundary demarcations. The judgment finds that the right-of-way road through Survey No. 9 belongs to the petitioners and dismisses the respondents' objections regarding property encroachment and access obstruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts