Shree Renukadevi Finance Mundgod vs IRFANSAB BHASHASAB KAMADOLLI — 57/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

P.C.R. - PRIVATE COMPLAINTS

CNR: KAUK810002602026

e-Filing Number

10-02-2026

Filing Number

57/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

57/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUNDGOD

Judge

530-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court Mundgod

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CC

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shree Renukadevi Finance Mundgod

    Adv. Shri. Mohamad Salim A. Nandikatti.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.IRFANSAB BHASHASAB KAMADOLLI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary of Case 57/2026 The court took cognizance of a cheque bounce complaint filed by Shree Renukadevi Finance Mundgod against Irfansab Bhashasab Kamadolli under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for an unpaid cheque of Rs. 64,340 dated 30-12-2025. The court registered a criminal case and directed issuance of summons to the accused, noting that under the special NI Act framework, no prior hearing to the accused was required before taking cognizance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court Mundgod

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 57/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 57/2026 The court took cognizance of a cheque bounce complaint filed by Shree Renukadevi Finance Mundgod against Irfansab Bhashasab Kamadolli under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for an unpaid cheque of Rs. 64,340 dated 30-12-2025. The court registered a criminal case and directed issuance of summons to the accused, noting that under the special NI Act framework, no prior hearing to the accused was required before taking cognizance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case