Shree Renukadevi Finance Mundgod vs ZAMEER ABDULGANI NIGONI — 55/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

P.C.R. - PRIVATE COMPLAINTS

CNR: KAUK810002582026

e-Filing Number

10-02-2026

Filing Number

55/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

55/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUNDGOD

Judge

530-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court Mundgod

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CC

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shree Renukadevi Finance Mundgod

    Adv. Shri. Mohamad Salim A. Nandikatti.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ZAMEER ABDULGANI NIGONI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 55/2026 Summary: The court took cognizance of a cheque bounce complaint filed by Shree Renukadevi Finance against Zameer Abdulgani Nigoni under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused issued cheque no. 612207 for Rs. 85,731 dated 26-12-2025 which was returned unpaid. The court registered a criminal case and directed summons be issued to the accused, holding that no prior hearing of the accused is required under the special Negotiable Instruments Act provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court Mundgod

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 55/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 55/2026 Summary: The court took cognizance of a cheque bounce complaint filed by Shree Renukadevi Finance against Zameer Abdulgani Nigoni under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused issued cheque no. 612207 for Rs. 85,731 dated 26-12-2025 which was returned unpaid. The court registered a criminal case and directed summons be issued to the accused, holding that no prior hearing of the accused is required under the special Negotiable Instruments Act provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case