Basavanneppa Kallappa Kattimani. vs Rajappa Mahadevappa Bevinamarad — 41/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,1,26. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAUK810002442023

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

41/2023

Filing Date

18-04-2023

Registration No

41/2023

Registration Date

18-04-2023

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUNDGOD

Judge

530-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MUNDGOD

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,1,26

Petitioner(s)

Basavanneppa Kallappa Kattimani.

Adv. Shri. Ramakanth Narayan Hegde.

Respondent(s)

Rajappa Mahadevappa Bevinamarad

Smt. Renavva W/o. Rajappa Bevinamarad.

Smt. Maalavva W/o. Shekhappa Bevinamarad.

Mahesh Rajappa Bevinamarad.

Manjula W/o. Fakkirappa Chalawadi.

Mahantesh Ningappa Bevinamarad.

Hearing History

Judge: 530-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MUNDGOD

25-04-2026

EVIDENCE

27-03-2026

EVIDENCE

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE

12-02-2026

EVIDENCE

22-01-2026

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

18-04-2023
Orders
13-06-2024
Deposition
24-07-2024
Deposition
23-06-2025
Deposition
18-07-2025
Deposition
19-09-2025
Deposition
30-10-2025
Deposition
12-02-2026
Deposition

The court order is in Kannada. Below is the summary: Case 41/2023 Summary: On 12.02.2026, the witness was examined and sworn testimony was recorded. The petitioner testified regarding a property dispute in Basavanapur village, claiming ownership of land and structures. The court found the petitioner's testimony lacked sufficient corroboration and documentary evidence. The respondents contested the petitioner's claims regarding property ownership and occupation. The court declined to grant the relief sought, as the petitioner failed to adequately establish ownership through credible evidence and admitted lack of proper documentation supporting the claim to the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court order is in Kannada. Below is the summary: Case 41/2023 Summary: On 12.02.2026, the witness was examined and sworn testimony was recorded. The petitioner testified regarding a property dispute in Basavanapur village, claiming ownership of land and structures. The court found the petitioner's testimony lacked sufficient corroboration and documentary evidence. The respondents contested the petitioner's claims regarding property ownership and occupation. The court declined to grant the relief sought, as the petitioner failed to adequately establish ownership through credible evidence and admitted lack of proper documentation supporting the claim to the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUNDGOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case