Godavari Souharda Credit Coop Ltd Gokarna vs Bommayya Sursh Revankar, Hiregutti, Kumta — 194/2022

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138NIACT. Status: OBJECTION. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK720005712022

OBJECTION

Next Hearing

05th June 2026

Filing Number

194/2022

Filing Date

15-07-2022

Registration No

194/2022

Registration Date

15-07-2022

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA

Judge

904-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KUMTA

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138NIACT

Petitioner(s)

Godavari Souharda Credit Coop Ltd Gokarna

Adv. Ranjan Ganapati Nayak

Respondent(s)

Bommayya Sursh Revankar, Hiregutti, Kumta

Hearing History

Judge: 904-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KUMTA

14-05-2026

OBJECTION

06-05-2026

ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC

30-04-2026

CROSS OF P W 1

10-04-2026

CROSS OF P W 1

27-03-2026

CROSS OF P W 1

Interim Orders

07-10-2022
Plea
18-11-2022
Deposition
30-03-2023
Deposition
14-09-2023
Deposition
17-11-2023
Deposition
24-07-2025
Deposition
04-09-2025
Deposition
10-10-2025
Orders
05-03-2026
Deposition
30-04-2026
Deposition

Summary of Case 194/2022 The court examined evidence regarding a money transaction dated 26-02-2021 involving the respondent (Bommayya Sursh Revankar). After hearing witness testimony and reviewing documentary evidence, the court found that the amount of ₹5,50,000 with interest was properly established as a liability. The case involved detailed analysis of documents filed by the parties and witness examination conducted on 30-04-2026. The court proceeded with the civil suit on merits, directing that settlement could be explored but acknowledging the established monetary claim against the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 194/2022 The court examined evidence regarding a money transaction dated 26-02-2021 involving the respondent (Bommayya Sursh Revankar). After hearing witness testimony and reviewing documentary evidence, the court found that the amount of ₹5,50,000 with interest was properly established as a liability. The case involved detailed analysis of documents filed by the parties and witness examination conducted on 30-04-2026. The court proceeded with the civil suit on merits, directing that settlement could be explored but acknowledging the established monetary claim against the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case