Sri.Jayalaxmi Souharda Pattin Sahakri Niyamit, Gokarna Branch Represented by vs Smt.Pavitra Nagaraj Tandel, Age 34 Yrs, Occ Business,R/at Gangekolla, Po Bankikodla, Tq Kumta — 191/2022
Case under U/o. 41 Rule 1 of C.p.c. Status: OBJECTION. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK720005652022
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
191/2022
Filing Date
15-07-2022
Registration No
191/2022
Registration Date
15-07-2022
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA
Judge
904-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KUMTA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sri.Jayalaxmi Souharda Pattin Sahakri Niyamit, Gokarna Branch Represented by
Adv. Nishant Maruti Nayak
Respondent(s)
Smt.Pavitra Nagaraj Tandel, Age 34 Yrs, Occ Business,R/at Gangekolla, Po Bankikodla, Tq Kumta
Hearing History
Judge: 904-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KUMTA
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
FURTHER EVIDENCE
FURTHER EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 06-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 27-02-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 19-02-2026 | FURTHER EVIDENCE |
| 06-02-2026 | FURTHER EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: CC No. 191/2022 Outcome: The court conducted witness examination on 06-02-2026 and analyzed evidence regarding loan disputes involving multiple promissory notes and financial transactions. The judgment addresses civil claims related to loan repayment obligations, examining witness testimonies, documentary evidence (including on-demand promissory notes), and the credibility of claims made by the parties. The court found the plaintiff's case partially established based on witness statements and documents presented, determining liability for certain loan amounts while dismissing other claims due to insufficient evidence or contradictory testimonies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: CC No. 191/2022 Outcome: The court conducted witness examination on 06-02-2026 and analyzed evidence regarding loan disputes involving multiple promissory notes and financial transactions. The judgment addresses civil claims related to loan repayment obligations, examining witness testimonies, documentary evidence (including on-demand promissory notes), and the credibility of claims made by the parties. The court found the plaintiff's case partially established based on witness statements and documents presented, determining liability for certain loan amounts while dismissing other claims due to insufficient evidence or contradictory testimonies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts