Kadamba Vividoddeshagala Souhardha Sahakari Ltd. Sirsi, Branch-Kumta R/by Santosha Ram Mukri vs Pushpa Ganapati Ambiga — 174/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,141,142. Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK720005182023

ORDERS

Next Hearing

23rd March 2026

Filing Number

174/2023

Filing Date

21-07-2023

Registration No

174/2023

Registration Date

21-07-2023

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA

Judge

904-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KUMTA

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,141,142

Petitioner(s)

Kadamba Vividoddeshagala Souhardha Sahakari Ltd. Sirsi, Branch-Kumta R/by Santosha Ram Mukri

Adv. Parameshwar Ganesh Hegde

Respondent(s)

Pushpa Ganapati Ambiga

Hearing History

Judge: 904-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KUMTA

12-03-2026

ORDERS

06-03-2026

ORDERS

03-03-2026

HEARING

27-02-2026

OBJECTION

19-02-2026

OBJECTION

Interim Orders

06-10-2023
Deposition
20-10-2023
Deposition
29-12-2023
Deposition
22-11-2024
Deposition
23-01-2025
Deposition
07-02-2025
Deposition
18-07-2025
Deposition
17-09-2025
313 Statement
06-11-2025
Deposition
11-12-2025
Deposition

Summary In case S.S. No. 174/2023, the court examined disputed bank account statements and petitions dated 11-12-2025. The court allowed certain petitions while dismissing others regarding account discrepancies, interest calculations, and loan-related disputes. Two petitions were granted (marked as No. 1 and 1(a)), while a second petition was also disposed of with specific directions regarding bank statements and calculations for the period up to October 10, 2024. The court also addressed issues concerning loan principals, interest amounts, and documentary evidence presented by the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In case S.S. No. 174/2023, the court examined disputed bank account statements and petitions dated 11-12-2025. The court allowed certain petitions while dismissing others regarding account discrepancies, interest calculations, and loan-related disputes. Two petitions were granted (marked as No. 1 and 1(a)), while a second petition was also disposed of with specific directions regarding bank statements and calculations for the period up to October 10, 2024. The court also addressed issues concerning loan principals, interest amounts, and documentary evidence presented by the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case