Kamalakar Nagappa Achari vs Manjunath Mahabaleshvar Hegde — 137/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK720004422023

ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

137/2023

Filing Date

20-07-2023

Registration No

137/2023

Registration Date

20-07-2023

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA

Judge

904-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KUMTA

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142

Petitioner(s)

Kamalakar Nagappa Achari

Adv. P G Hegde

Respondent(s)

Manjunath Mahabaleshvar Hegde

Hearing History

Judge: 904-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KUMTA

04-06-2026

ARGUMENTS

13-05-2026

ARGUMENTS

05-05-2026

DEFENCE EVIDENCE

30-04-2026

DEFENCE EVIDENCE

24-04-2026

ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC

Interim Orders

07-11-2023
Deposition
07-03-2024
Deposition
11-07-2025
Deposition
17-04-2026
Deposition

Summary of Case 137/2023 (Kamalakar Nagappa Achari v. Manjunath Mahabaleshvar Hegde) On 17-04-2026, witness examination was completed in this civil case. The court analyzed evidence regarding disputed cheques (₹2,60,000 and ₹2,50,000), examining issues of cheque authenticity, signatures, and the respondent's claim that the petitioner failed to produce the original cheque as promised. The court found the respondent's account credible regarding the cheque's whereabouts and the failure to produce it in proceedings. The case appears to have concluded with witness testimony being finalized, though no final judgment disposition is explicitly stated in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 137/2023 (Kamalakar Nagappa Achari v. Manjunath Mahabaleshvar Hegde) On 17-04-2026, witness examination was completed in this civil case. The court analyzed evidence regarding disputed cheques (₹2,60,000 and ₹2,50,000), examining issues of cheque authenticity, signatures, and the respondent's claim that the petitioner failed to produce the original cheque as promised. The court found the respondent's account credible regarding the cheque's whereabouts and the failure to produce it in proceedings. The case appears to have concluded with witness testimony being finalized, though no final judgment disposition is explicitly stated in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case