Vinod S/o. Ganapati Gaonkar vs Manoj M. Naik — 506/2024
Case under Sec 28(a) R/w Order 21 Rule 10 of Cpc Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAUK720004022024
Filing Number
59/2024
Filing Date
10-12-2024
Registration No
506/2024
Registration Date
13-12-2024
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA
Judge
904-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KUMTA
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vinod S/o. Ganapati Gaonkar
Adv. JANARDHAN PANDURANGA NAIK
Respondent(s)
Manoj M. Naik
The Divisional Manager, United Indias Insurance Co.Ltd
Hearing History
Judge: 904-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KUMTA
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
Evidence of Respondent
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 02-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence of Respondent |
Final Orders / Judgements
Orders
Judgment
Interim Orders
Case Summary: MVC No. 506/2024 The court allowed the petitioner's application to condone a 30-day delay in filing a motor vehicle compensation claim under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. Although the petition was filed on December 8, 2024—beyond the 6-month statutory limit from the May 9, 2024 accident—the court held that Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act applies to motor vehicle claims, and the Motor Vehicles Act (being beneficial legislation) should receive liberal interpretation to prevent victim hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Issue
Deposition
Case Summary: MVC No. 506/2024 The court allowed the petitioner's application to condone a 30-day delay in filing a motor vehicle compensation claim under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. Although the petition was filed on December 8, 2024—beyond the 6-month statutory limit from the May 9, 2024 accident—the court held that Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act applies to motor vehicle claims, and the Motor Vehicles Act (being beneficial legislation) should receive liberal interpretation to prevent victim hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts