Rama shivu Gouda, r/o Bhimanakonda, Gokarna vs Venkatramana Ganapati Gouda, r/o Bhimanakonda, Gokarna — 2/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O41r1,2. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 02nd May 2026.

Case disposed

R.A. - Regular Appeals

CNR: KAUK720002712025

Filing Number

14/2025

Filing Date

28-Oct-2025

Registration No

2/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA

Judge

904-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Kumta

Decision Date

02-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O41r1,2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rama shivu Gouda, r/o Bhimanakonda, Gokarna

    Adv. Vinayak Suresh Shetty

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Venkatramana Ganapati Gouda, r/o Bhimanakonda, Gokarna

  2. 2.Timmappa Ganapati Gouda

  3. 3.Narayan Ganapati Gouda

  4. 4.Somi Sukru Gouda

  5. 5.Rama Sukru Gouda

  6. 6.Sanni Nagappa gouda, since deceased reptd by Laxmi Kumar gouda

  7. 7.Mangala Sukru Gouda

  8. 8.Shanti Nagappa Gouda

  9. 9.Sharada Nagappa Gouda

  10. 10.Raghavendra Nagappa Gouda

  11. 11.Nagappa Jogi Gouda

  12. 12.Laxmi Pandurang gouda

  13. 13.Mangala ramesh Gouda

  14. 14.Sukri Ganapu Gouda

  15. 15.Susheela Devanna Gouda

  16. 16.Sudha Rama Gouda

  17. 17.Ganapati Madev gouda

  18. 18.Gouri Venkatapati Gouda

  19. 19.Subbi Mahabaleshwar Gouda

  20. 20.Gange Mankali gouda

  21. 21.Shivananad Narayan Gouda,

  22. 22.Gulabi Narayan Gouda

  23. 23.Somi Venkatramana Gouda

  24. 24.NagaMMa Shivu Gouda

  25. 25.Hulagi W/ Goydu Gouda

  26. 26.Sharada Mankali gouda

  27. 27.Madevi Maneshwar Gouda

  28. 28.Kariya goydu Gouda

  29. 29.Nagaveni Venkatrmana Gouda

  30. 30.Venkatramana Soma Gouda

  31. 31.Manjunatha Soma Gouda

  32. 32.Nagappa Soma gouda

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2026

    OrdersView PDF

  3. 02-May-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: R.A. No. 2/2026 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed the appeal and confirmed the trial court's partition decree dated 01.10.2024. The trial court correctly decreed the suit granting equal ½ shares to the plaintiffs (Rama Shivu Gouda and others) and defendants 1-5 in the joint family property, with defendants 6-23 receiving 1/10 share each as they were formal parties only. The court found the appellant (defendant 11) failed to contest the matter by filing written statements or producing evidence to support claims for property shares. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 02-May-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Kumta

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Kumta

  6. 23-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Kumta

  7. 17-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Kumta

  8. 15-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Kumta

  9. 06-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Kumta

  10. 02-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Kumta

  11. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Kumta

  12. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Kumta

  13. 07-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Kumta

  14. 24-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Kumta

  15. 16-Feb-2026

    Amendment.

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Kumta

  16. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 28-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.A. No. 2/2026 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed the appeal and confirmed the trial court's partition decree dated 01.10.2024. The trial court correctly decreed the suit granting equal ½ shares to the plaintiffs (Rama Shivu Gouda and others) and defendants 1-5 in the joint family property, with defendants 6-23 receiving 1/10 share each as they were formal parties only. The court found the appellant (defendant 11) failed to contest the matter by filing written statements or producing evidence to support claims for property shares. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case