Tanishka D/o Ramu Vernekar, since minor reptd by her father Ramu Vernekar vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd. — 7/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 08th May 2026.
Misc - Miscellaneous Cases
CNR: KAUK720000352026
Filing Number
7/2026
Filing Date
28-Jan-2026
Registration No
7/2026
Registration Date
28-Jan-2026
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA
Judge
904-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Kumta
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CLOSED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Tanishka D/o Ramu Vernekar, since minor reptd by her father Ramu Vernekar
Adv. Ashok Ishwar Naik
-
2.Advit Raghavendra Gudigar since minor represented by his father Raghavendra Gudigar
-
3.Arjun S/o Laxminarayan Kochrekar, since minor repted by his father Laxminaryan Kochrekar
-
4.Aira D/o Aziz Begh since minor represented by her father Aziz Begh
-
5.Jatti Parameshwar Mukri,
Respondent(s)
-
1.United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
OrdersView PDF
The court closed Civil Miscellaneous Case 7/2026 filed by three minors (Tanishka, Advit, and Arjun) against United India Insurance Co. Ltd. The petition was dismissed because the petitioners had already filed a separate civil miscellaneous case seeking compensation, making the present petition redundant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Disposed
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Kumta
-
04-Apr-2026
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Kumta
-
13-Mar-2026
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Kumta
-
26-Feb-2026
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Kumta
-
13-Feb-2026
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Kumta
-
28-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 7/2026
The court closed Civil Miscellaneous Case 7/2026 filed by three minors (Tanishka, Advit, and Arjun) against United India Insurance Co. Ltd. The petition was dismissed because the petitioners had already filed a separate civil miscellaneous case seeking compensation, making the present petition redundant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts