The Janata Co-Operative Credit Society Limited Hanehalli Tq. Kumta, Rby. Ravi Narayan Naik, vs Bhagirath Sukru Gouda, Pigmi agent, at. Gonehalli, Po.Torke, Kumta — 28/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: ISSUE NBW. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK710046712025
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
Filing Number
783/2025
Filing Date
24-11-2025
Registration No
28/2026
Registration Date
07-01-2026
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA
Judge
633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Janata Co-Operative Credit Society Limited Hanehalli Tq. Kumta, Rby. Ravi Narayan Naik,
Adv. Dattatraya Shankar Bhat
Respondent(s)
Bhagirath Sukru Gouda, Pigmi agent, at. Gonehalli, Po.Torke, Kumta
Hearing History
Judge: 633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA
ISSUE NBW
ISSUE NBW
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED
Issue Summons to accused
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ISSUE NBW |
| 18-02-2026 | ISSUE NBW |
| 10-02-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED |
| 19-01-2026 | Issue Summons to accused |
| 07-01-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
Interim Orders
The court (Case No. 783/2025, P.W. 1) recorded the plaintiff's sworn statement on 24-12-2025 and admitted various documents as evidence, including certificates, checks, bank statements, loan agreements, and account statements marked as exhibits N.P. 1 through N.P. 10. The court cross-examined the witness and, based on the witness examination and documents submitted, directed that the case proceed to judgment as prayed by the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court (Case No. 783/2025, P.W. 1) recorded the plaintiff's sworn statement on 24-12-2025 and admitted various documents as evidence, including certificates, checks, bank statements, loan agreements, and account statements marked as exhibits N.P. 1 through N.P. 10. The court cross-examined the witness and, based on the witness examination and documents submitted, directed that the case proceed to judgment as prayed by the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts