THE STATE OF KARNATAKA vs VIKRANT BHIMAPPA NADAGOUDA,LOKAPUAR,MUDHOL Bagalkot, — 3578/2025
Case under Child Labour Prohibition and Regulation Rules Section 3,3(1),14(1). Status: Issue B/W. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK710043972025
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
e-Filing Number
30-10-2025
Filing Number
3040/2025
Filing Date
30-10-2025
Registration No
3578/2025
Registration Date
30-10-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA
Judge
633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA
FIR Details
FIR Number
0070
Police Station
GOKARNA PS
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Adv. Assistant Government Pleader, Addl. Court
Respondent(s)
VIKRANT BHIMAPPA NADAGOUDA,LOKAPUAR,MUDHOL Bagalkot,
Hearing History
Judge: 633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA
Issue B/W
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
ISSUE NBW
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Issue B/W |
| 24-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 28-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | ISSUE NBW |
| 19-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA v. VIKRANT BHIMAPPA NADAGOUDA (3578/2025) The court examined allegations of child labor involving the respondent. The court found that the respondent allegedly employed a child (ages 9-11) in construction work and falsified documents, including Aadhaar cards and school records. The court determined that the respondent failed to produce proper documentation, made false claims about the child's residence and enrollment, and engaged in unauthorized practices. The case proceeded through witness examination on 24-04-2026, with cross-examination conducted. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA v. VIKRANT BHIMAPPA NADAGOUDA (3578/2025) The court examined allegations of child labor involving the respondent. The court found that the respondent allegedly employed a child (ages 9-11) in construction work and falsified documents, including Aadhaar cards and school records. The court determined that the respondent failed to produce proper documentation, made false claims about the child's residence and enrollment, and engaged in unauthorized practices. The case proceeded through witness examination on 24-04-2026, with cross-examination conducted. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts