Lakshmi Narasimha Rupinga Products, owner Raghavendra Jaiwant Pai Industrial Estate, Hegde vs Mukambika Enterprises, Owner Gopal Poojari, 40 yrs, at. Herroru, tq.Brammavar, Dist. Udupi, 576 213 — 696/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

P.C.R. - PRIVATE COMPLAINTS

CNR: KAUK710042422025

HEARING

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

696/2025

Filing Date

16-10-2025

Registration No

696/2025

Registration Date

16-10-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA

Judge

529-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KUMTA

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142

Petitioner(s)

Lakshmi Narasimha Rupinga Products, owner Raghavendra Jaiwant Pai Industrial Estate, Hegde

Adv. Vinodkumar Padmanabha Thakarsi

Respondent(s)

Mukambika Enterprises, Owner Gopal Poojari, 40 yrs, at. Herroru, tq.Brammavar, Dist. Udupi, 576 213

Hearing History

Judge: 529-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KUMTA

06-03-2026

HEARING

06-01-2026

HEARING

16-12-2025

HEARING

24-11-2025

HEARING

10-11-2025

HEARING

Interim Orders

10-11-2025
Deposition

Summary This is a civil case (PC No. 696/2025) in which the plaintiff's certified statement and supporting documents (including bank statements, notices, tax invoices dated March-April 2025, and correspondence related to an enterprise) were admitted as evidence. The court recorded the plaintiff's testimony on 10-11-2025 and, based on the witness examination and documentary evidence, the court found the plaintiff's claims to be substantiated and approved the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a civil case (PC No. 696/2025) in which the plaintiff's certified statement and supporting documents (including bank statements, notices, tax invoices dated March-April 2025, and correspondence related to an enterprise) were admitted as evidence. The court recorded the plaintiff's testimony on 10-11-2025 and, based on the witness examination and documentary evidence, the court found the plaintiff's claims to be substantiated and approved the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case