Lakshmi Narasimha Rupinga Products, owner Raghavendra Jaiwant Pai Industrial Estate, Hegde vs Mukambika Enterprises, Owner Gopal Poojari, 40 yrs, at. Herroru, tq.Brammavar, Dist. Udupi, 576 213 — 696/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
P.C.R. - PRIVATE COMPLAINTS
CNR: KAUK710042422025
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
696/2025
Filing Date
16-10-2025
Registration No
696/2025
Registration Date
16-10-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA
Judge
529-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KUMTA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lakshmi Narasimha Rupinga Products, owner Raghavendra Jaiwant Pai Industrial Estate, Hegde
Adv. Vinodkumar Padmanabha Thakarsi
Respondent(s)
Mukambika Enterprises, Owner Gopal Poojari, 40 yrs, at. Herroru, tq.Brammavar, Dist. Udupi, 576 213
Hearing History
Judge: 529-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KUMTA
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 06-01-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-12-2025 | HEARING |
| 24-11-2025 | HEARING |
| 10-11-2025 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a civil case (PC No. 696/2025) in which the plaintiff's certified statement and supporting documents (including bank statements, notices, tax invoices dated March-April 2025, and correspondence related to an enterprise) were admitted as evidence. The court recorded the plaintiff's testimony on 10-11-2025 and, based on the witness examination and documentary evidence, the court found the plaintiff's claims to be substantiated and approved the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a civil case (PC No. 696/2025) in which the plaintiff's certified statement and supporting documents (including bank statements, notices, tax invoices dated March-April 2025, and correspondence related to an enterprise) were admitted as evidence. The court recorded the plaintiff's testimony on 10-11-2025 and, based on the witness examination and documentary evidence, the court found the plaintiff's claims to be substantiated and approved the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts