Omkar Cr. Souharda Sahakari Niy. Bastipete Kumta Madangeri Branch,R/by. Raghavendra V. Nayak vs Manjuanth Holiyappa Patagar, 40 yrs, Ryot, at.Hiregutti, Kumta — 3463/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,141,142. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK710041742025
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
Filing Number
677/2025
Filing Date
10-10-2025
Registration No
3463/2025
Registration Date
24-10-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA
Judge
633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Omkar Cr. Souharda Sahakari Niy. Bastipete Kumta Madangeri Branch,R/by. Raghavendra V. Nayak
Adv. Parameshwar Ganesh Hegde
Respondent(s)
Manjuanth Holiyappa Patagar, 40 yrs, Ryot, at.Hiregutti, Kumta
Hearing History
Judge: 633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA
EVIDENCE
LOKADALATH
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-03-2026 | LOKADALATH |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 17-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 23-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: In PC No. 677/2025, the court recorded the plaintiff's sworn statement on 24-10-2025 after examining the witness. The plaintiff submitted certified copies of various documents including bank statements, demand promissory notes, loan agreements, and notices, which were marked as exhibits (NP 1-10). After examining the witness testimony and documents, the court directed that the case proceed as per the plaintiff's claims, and the witness statement was recorded in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In PC No. 677/2025, the court recorded the plaintiff's sworn statement on 24-10-2025 after examining the witness. The plaintiff submitted certified copies of various documents including bank statements, demand promissory notes, loan agreements, and notices, which were marked as exhibits (NP 1-10). After examining the witness testimony and documents, the court directed that the case proceed as per the plaintiff's claims, and the witness statement was recorded in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts