Venkatesh Mahadev Harikantra, 46 yrs, Buisness, at. Hiregutti, Tq.Kumta vs Jyoti Vasant Naik w/o. Vasant Shivu Naik, 42 yrs, Teacher, at.Bargi, Tq. Kumta — 3661/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: ISSUE NBW. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK710041102025
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
647/2025
Filing Date
23-09-2025
Registration No
3661/2025
Registration Date
13-11-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA
Judge
633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Venkatesh Mahadev Harikantra, 46 yrs, Buisness, at. Hiregutti, Tq.Kumta
Adv. Priyanka H Kagal
Respondent(s)
Jyoti Vasant Naik w/o. Vasant Shivu Naik, 42 yrs, Teacher, at.Bargi, Tq. Kumta
Hearing History
Judge: 633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA
ISSUE NBW
ISSUE NBW
ISSUE NBW
ISSUE NBW
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | ISSUE NBW |
| 05-02-2026 | ISSUE NBW |
| 31-12-2025 | ISSUE NBW |
| 19-12-2025 | ISSUE NBW |
| 04-12-2025 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED |
Interim Orders
Case Summary - 3661/2025 Note: The document provided is actually Case PC No. 647/2025, not 3661/2025. The court recorded the petitioner's sworn statement on 12-11-2025. The petitioner submitted various documents as evidence, including a check, bank confirmation, and notice-related papers with postal receipts. The court admitted these documents into the record and proceeded with witness examination. The petitioner requested that the order be passed based on witness testimony and documentary evidence. The case was adjourned for further proceedings in open court based on witness statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary - 3661/2025 Note: The document provided is actually Case PC No. 647/2025, not 3661/2025. The court recorded the petitioner's sworn statement on 12-11-2025. The petitioner submitted various documents as evidence, including a check, bank confirmation, and notice-related papers with postal receipts. The court admitted these documents into the record and proceeded with witness examination. The petitioner requested that the order be passed based on witness testimony and documentary evidence. The case was adjourned for further proceedings in open court based on witness statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts