Venkatraman Rama Kavari, Age 51 yrs, R/o. Devarabavi, Post. Torke, Taluk Kumta vs Bhagwan Pandurang Redkar, R/o. Tadadi Post. Gokarna, Taluk Kumta — 2305/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: ISSUE NBW. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK710038332024

ISSUE NBW

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

Filing Number

2305/2024

Filing Date

10-12-2024

Registration No

2305/2024

Registration Date

10-12-2024

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA

Judge

633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223

Petitioner(s)

Venkatraman Rama Kavari, Age 51 yrs, R/o. Devarabavi, Post. Torke, Taluk Kumta

Adv. Ranjan Ganapati Nayak

Respondent(s)

Bhagwan Pandurang Redkar, R/o. Tadadi Post. Gokarna, Taluk Kumta

Hearing History

Judge: 633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA

13-03-2026

ISSUE NBW

21-02-2026

ISSUE NBW

07-02-2026

ISSUE NBW

29-12-2025

ISSUE NBW

27-12-2025

ISSUE NBW

Interim Orders

17-07-2025
Deposition

Case 2305/2024 Summary In this civil case heard on 17-07-2025, petitioner Venkatraman Rama Kavari testified regarding a loan dispute with respondent Bhagwan Pandurang Redkar. The petitioner claimed he lent money to the respondent (a fishing business operator earning approximately Rs. 10 lakhs annually) without any formal agreement or collateral. The petitioner stated he withdrew funds from his bank account to provide the loan and offered to produce bank account statements as evidence. The court recorded the petitioner's examination-in-chief testimony and cross-examination by the respondent's counsel was granted. The case was subsequently adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 2305/2024 Summary In this civil case heard on 17-07-2025, petitioner Venkatraman Rama Kavari testified regarding a loan dispute with respondent Bhagwan Pandurang Redkar. The petitioner claimed he lent money to the respondent (a fishing business operator earning approximately Rs. 10 lakhs annually) without any formal agreement or collateral. The petitioner stated he withdrew funds from his bank account to provide the loan and offered to produce bank account statements as evidence. The court recorded the petitioner's examination-in-chief testimony and cross-examination by the respondent's counsel was granted. The case was subsequently adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case