Venkatraman Rama Kavari, Age 51 yrs, R/o. Devarabavi, Post. Torke, Taluk Kumta vs Bhagwan Pandurang Redkar, R/o. Tadadi Post. Gokarna, Taluk Kumta — 2305/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: ISSUE NBW. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK710038332024
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
2305/2024
Filing Date
10-12-2024
Registration No
2305/2024
Registration Date
10-12-2024
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA
Judge
633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Venkatraman Rama Kavari, Age 51 yrs, R/o. Devarabavi, Post. Torke, Taluk Kumta
Adv. Ranjan Ganapati Nayak
Respondent(s)
Bhagwan Pandurang Redkar, R/o. Tadadi Post. Gokarna, Taluk Kumta
Hearing History
Judge: 633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA
ISSUE NBW
ISSUE NBW
ISSUE NBW
ISSUE NBW
ISSUE NBW
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | ISSUE NBW |
| 21-02-2026 | ISSUE NBW |
| 07-02-2026 | ISSUE NBW |
| 29-12-2025 | ISSUE NBW |
| 27-12-2025 | ISSUE NBW |
Interim Orders
Case 2305/2024 Summary In this civil case heard on 17-07-2025, petitioner Venkatraman Rama Kavari testified regarding a loan dispute with respondent Bhagwan Pandurang Redkar. The petitioner claimed he lent money to the respondent (a fishing business operator earning approximately Rs. 10 lakhs annually) without any formal agreement or collateral. The petitioner stated he withdrew funds from his bank account to provide the loan and offered to produce bank account statements as evidence. The court recorded the petitioner's examination-in-chief testimony and cross-examination by the respondent's counsel was granted. The case was subsequently adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 2305/2024 Summary In this civil case heard on 17-07-2025, petitioner Venkatraman Rama Kavari testified regarding a loan dispute with respondent Bhagwan Pandurang Redkar. The petitioner claimed he lent money to the respondent (a fishing business operator earning approximately Rs. 10 lakhs annually) without any formal agreement or collateral. The petitioner stated he withdrew funds from his bank account to provide the loan and offered to produce bank account statements as evidence. The court recorded the petitioner's examination-in-chief testimony and cross-examination by the respondent's counsel was granted. The case was subsequently adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts