Venkatraman Rama Kavari, Age 51 yrs, R/o. Devarabavi, Post. Torke, Taluk Kumta vs Bhagwan Pandurang Redkar, R/o. Tadadi Post. Gokarna, Taluk Kumta — 2305/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Issue NBW. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

Issue NBW Next hearing 06-Jun-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK710038332024

Filing Number

2305/2024

Filing Date

10-Dec-2024

Registration No

2305/2024

Registration Date

10-Dec-2024

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA

Judge

633-Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Venkatraman Rama Kavari, Age 51 yrs, R/o. Devarabavi, Post. Torke, Taluk Kumta

    Adv. Ranjan Ganapati Nayak

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bhagwan Pandurang Redkar, R/o. Tadadi Post. Gokarna, Taluk Kumta

Case History

  1. 06-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Issue NBW

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  3. 21-Feb-2026

    Issue NBW

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  4. 07-Feb-2026

    Issue NBW

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  5. 29-Dec-2025

    Issue NBW

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  6. 27-Dec-2025

    Issue NBW

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  7. 04-Dec-2025

    Issue NBW

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  8. 14-Nov-2025

    Issue NBW

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  9. 17-Oct-2025

    Issue NBW

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  10. 03-Oct-2025

    Issue NBW

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  11. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  12. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  13. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  14. 17-Jul-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Case 2305/2024 Summary In this civil case heard on 17-07-2025, petitioner Venkatraman Rama Kavari testified regarding a loan dispute with respondent Bhagwan Pandurang Redkar. The petitioner claimed he lent money to the respondent (a fishing business operator earning approximately Rs. 10 lakhs annually) without any formal agreement or collateral. The petitioner stated he withdrew funds from his bank account to provide the loan and offered to produce bank account statements as evidence. The court recorded the petitioner's examination-in-chief testimony and cross-examination by the respondent's counsel was granted. The case was subsequently adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  15. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  16. 26-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  17. 11-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  18. 08-May-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  19. 03-Mar-2025

    Issue NBW

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  20. 28-Jan-2025

    Issue NBW

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  21. 08-Jan-2025

    Issue NBW

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  22. 10-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 10-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2305/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 2305/2024 Summary In this civil case heard on 17-07-2025, petitioner Venkatraman Rama Kavari testified regarding a loan dispute with respondent Bhagwan Pandurang Redkar. The petitioner claimed he lent money to the respondent (a fishing business operator earning approximately Rs. 10 lakhs annually) without any formal agreement or collateral. The petitioner stated he withdrew funds from his bank account to provide the loan and offered to produce bank account statements as evidence. The court recorded the petitioner's examination-in-chief testimony and cross-examination by the respondent's counsel was granted. The case was subsequently adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case