Godavari Souharda Credit Co-operative Ltd. Gokarna Branch vs Sri.Vinayak Tukaram TAndel, Driver, Ra/t Gangekolla, Nadumakskeri, TQ Kumta 581319 — 3266/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK710034742025
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
591/2025
Filing Date
01-09-2025
Registration No
3266/2025
Registration Date
16-09-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA
Judge
633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Godavari Souharda Credit Co-operative Ltd. Gokarna Branch
Adv. Nishant Maruti Nayak
Respondent(s)
Sri.Vinayak Tukaram TAndel, Driver, Ra/t Gangekolla, Nadumakskeri, TQ Kumta 581319
Hearing History
Judge: 633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 12-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 12-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 23-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
This court order (Case No. 3266/2025, dated 06-03-2026) is in Kannada. The document addresses a civil petition regarding a loan matter. The court examined discrepancies in the loan application documents, including missing supporting documentation, procedural irregularities regarding the administrative board meeting date, and inconsistencies between stated dates. The court found that the loan application contained false or incomplete information and determined that the petition cannot be granted due to these material defects in the application process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This court order (Case No. 3266/2025, dated 06-03-2026) is in Kannada. The document addresses a civil petition regarding a loan matter. The court examined discrepancies in the loan application documents, including missing supporting documentation, procedural irregularities regarding the administrative board meeting date, and inconsistencies between stated dates. The court found that the loan application contained false or incomplete information and determined that the petition cannot be granted due to these material defects in the application process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts