Godavari Souharda Credit Co-operative Ltd. Gokarna Branch vs Sri.Vinayak Tukaram TAndel, Driver, Ra/t Gangekolla, Nadumakskeri, TQ Kumta 581319 — 3266/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK710034742025

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

Filing Number

591/2025

Filing Date

01-09-2025

Registration No

3266/2025

Registration Date

16-09-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA

Judge

633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223

Petitioner(s)

Godavari Souharda Credit Co-operative Ltd. Gokarna Branch

Adv. Nishant Maruti Nayak

Respondent(s)

Sri.Vinayak Tukaram TAndel, Driver, Ra/t Gangekolla, Nadumakskeri, TQ Kumta 581319

Hearing History

Judge: 633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

12-02-2026

EVIDENCE

29-01-2026

EVIDENCE

12-01-2026

EVIDENCE

23-12-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

16-09-2025
Orders
16-09-2025
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition

This court order (Case No. 3266/2025, dated 06-03-2026) is in Kannada. The document addresses a civil petition regarding a loan matter. The court examined discrepancies in the loan application documents, including missing supporting documentation, procedural irregularities regarding the administrative board meeting date, and inconsistencies between stated dates. The court found that the loan application contained false or incomplete information and determined that the petition cannot be granted due to these material defects in the application process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This court order (Case No. 3266/2025, dated 06-03-2026) is in Kannada. The document addresses a civil petition regarding a loan matter. The court examined discrepancies in the loan application documents, including missing supporting documentation, procedural irregularities regarding the administrative board meeting date, and inconsistencies between stated dates. The court found that the loan application contained false or incomplete information and determined that the petition cannot be granted due to these material defects in the application process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case