THE STATE OF KARNATAKA vs NAGAPPA SUKRU GOUDA, TIPPASAGI KADIME, KUMTA — 2550/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 3,181,5,180,146,196. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK710032652025
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
e-Filing Number
07-08-2025
Filing Number
2265/2025
Filing Date
07-08-2025
Registration No
2550/2025
Registration Date
07-08-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA
Judge
633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor.
Respondent(s)
NAGAPPA SUKRU GOUDA, TIPPASAGI KADIME, KUMTA
SUKRU SUKRU GOUDA
Hearing History
Judge: 633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA
ARGUMENTS
COMPLY
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 06-03-2026 | COMPLY |
| 26-02-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No: C.C. No. 2550/2025, C.W. 13, P.W. 07 Court: Additional Civil Judge & First Additional District Magistrate Court, Kumta (Karnataka) Language: Kannada Outcome: The court rejected the defense arguments and found the accused (a police inspector named Sridhar S.R., age 44) guilty of fabricating a false criminal case. The court concluded that the accused created fake evidence, forged witness statements, and manufactured a fraudulent FIR (No. 72/2025) to implicate two individuals in a motor vehicle accident case. The court held that the evidence, witnesses, and documents were entirely fabricated and that the accused conspired to frame innocent persons for insurance compensation purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No: C.C. No. 2550/2025, C.W. 13, P.W. 07 Court: Additional Civil Judge & First Additional District Magistrate Court, Kumta (Karnataka) Language: Kannada Outcome: The court rejected the defense arguments and found the accused (a police inspector named Sridhar S.R., age 44) guilty of fabricating a false criminal case. The court concluded that the accused created fake evidence, forged witness statements, and manufactured a fraudulent FIR (No. 72/2025) to implicate two individuals in a motor vehicle accident case. The court held that the evidence, witnesses, and documents were entirely fabricated and that the accused conspired to frame innocent persons for insurance compensation purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts