The Janata Co-Operative Credit Society Limited Hanehalli, Kumta vs Krishnmurthi Somanath Naik, Kelaginkeri, Aghanasini, Kumta — 2566/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: ISSUE NBW. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK710030812025
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
422/2025
Filing Date
17-07-2025
Registration No
2566/2025
Registration Date
07-08-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA
Judge
633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Janata Co-Operative Credit Society Limited Hanehalli, Kumta
Adv. Dattatraya Shankar Bhat
Respondent(s)
Krishnmurthi Somanath Naik, Kelaginkeri, Aghanasini, Kumta
Hearing History
Judge: 633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA
ISSUE NBW
ISSUE NBW
ISSUE NBW
ISSUE NBW
ISSUE NBW
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | ISSUE NBW |
| 05-02-2026 | ISSUE NBW |
| 31-12-2025 | ISSUE NBW |
| 06-12-2025 | ISSUE NBW |
| 21-11-2025 | ISSUE NBW |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 2566/2025 The Janata Co-Operative Credit Society Limited v. Krishnmurthi Somanath Naik The court recorded the plaintiff's sworn statement on 01-08-2025 and admitted certified copies of documents including loan application, loan agreement, bank statements, notice to defendant, postal acknowledgment, and loan account statements as evidence (marked as N.P.1 through N.P.9). After examining witness testimony and documentary evidence, the court directed that a decree be issued in favor of the plaintiff as prayed. The case proceeded through evidence examination with witness statement recorded in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 2566/2025 The Janata Co-Operative Credit Society Limited v. Krishnmurthi Somanath Naik The court recorded the plaintiff's sworn statement on 01-08-2025 and admitted certified copies of documents including loan application, loan agreement, bank statements, notice to defendant, postal acknowledgment, and loan account statements as evidence (marked as N.P.1 through N.P.9). After examining witness testimony and documentary evidence, the court directed that a decree be issued in favor of the plaintiff as prayed. The case proceeded through evidence examination with witness statement recorded in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts