St. Milagres credit Souharda Co op ltd.Gokarn Karwar Branch Kumta vs Manjunath Jatti Hanehalli, Buisness, at.Bankikolda,Keni, Tq. Ankola — 2526/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED on 06th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK710027912025

Case disposed

Filing Number

375/2025

Filing Date

05-07-2025

Registration No

2526/2025

Registration Date

02-08-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA

Judge

633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CONVICTED

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142

Petitioner(s)

St. Milagres credit Souharda Co op ltd.Gokarn Karwar Branch Kumta

Adv. Mangalmurti Ganapati Sabhahit

Respondent(s)

Manjunath Jatti Hanehalli, Buisness, at.Bankikolda,Keni, Tq. Ankola

Hearing History

Judge: 633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA

06-03-2026

Disposed

28-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

18-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

04-02-2026

EVIDENCE

21-01-2026

EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
Orders

The court found the accused guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (dishonored cheque) and sentenced him to pay compensation of Rs. 1,66,956 to the plaintiff and Rs. 4,000 to the state, with six months simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court also clarified under Section 461 that the compensation obligation cannot be waived even if imprisonment is served. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

15-07-2025
Deposition
02-08-2025
Orders
31-12-2025
Deposition
04-02-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (dishonored cheque) and sentenced him to pay compensation of Rs. 1,66,956 to the plaintiff and Rs. 4,000 to the state, with six months simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court also clarified under Section 461 that the compensation obligation cannot be waived even if imprisonment is served. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case