Safe Star Souhardha Sahakari Niyamita vs Geetanjali gurucharana Shet, 40 yrs, Business, Ganjigadde, Gokarna post, Kumta — 2238/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,141,142. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK710023462025

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

24th March 2026

Filing Number

314/2025

Filing Date

18-06-2025

Registration No

2238/2025

Registration Date

05-07-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA

Judge

633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,141,142

Petitioner(s)

Safe Star Souhardha Sahakari Niyamita

Adv. Parameshwar Ganesh Hegde

Respondent(s)

Geetanjali gurucharana Shet, 40 yrs, Business, Ganjigadde, Gokarna post, Kumta

Hearing History

Judge: 633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

19-02-2026

EVIDENCE

30-01-2026

EVIDENCE

13-01-2026

EVIDENCE

22-12-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

02-07-2025
Deposition

Case Summary Case No. P.C. 314/2025 The court recorded the plaintiff's certified statement on 02-07-2025 after examining the witness. The plaintiff submitted certified copies of various documents including bank checks, receipts, loan agreement, demand promissory note, and account statements as evidence (marked as N.P. 1-14). The court examined and verified all documents, cross-referenced them with originals, and returned the original documents to the defendant. Based on witness examination and documentary evidence, the court found the plaintiff's claims substantiated and granted the relief as sought in the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No. P.C. 314/2025 The court recorded the plaintiff's certified statement on 02-07-2025 after examining the witness. The plaintiff submitted certified copies of various documents including bank checks, receipts, loan agreement, demand promissory note, and account statements as evidence (marked as N.P. 1-14). The court examined and verified all documents, cross-referenced them with originals, and returned the original documents to the defendant. Based on witness examination and documentary evidence, the court found the plaintiff's claims substantiated and granted the relief as sought in the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case