THE STATE OF KARNATAKA vs MARUTI VENKATRAMAN NAIK — 1733/2025
Case under Karnataka Excise Act 1965 Section 13,14,.15,32,38(A). Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK710022952025
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
e-Filing Number
28-05-2025
Filing Number
1641/2025
Filing Date
12-06-2025
Registration No
1733/2025
Registration Date
12-06-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA
Judge
633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Respondent(s)
MARUTI VENKATRAMAN NAIK
Hearing History
Judge: 633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 12-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 22-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 29-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 27-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: C.C.No. 1733/2025, C.W. 02 P.W. 01 Outcome: The court examined witness testimony in a criminal case dated 06-03-2026. Cross-examination of the witness (Mohini) by the defense counsel revealed inconsistencies and contradictions in her statements regarding allegations of assault and criminal intimidation. The court found the witness's testimony unreliable in several key aspects and noted significant discrepancies between her judicial statement and her cross-examination responses. The case proceedings continued with examination of evidence and documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: C.C.No. 1733/2025, C.W. 02 P.W. 01 Outcome: The court examined witness testimony in a criminal case dated 06-03-2026. Cross-examination of the witness (Mohini) by the defense counsel revealed inconsistencies and contradictions in her statements regarding allegations of assault and criminal intimidation. The court found the witness's testimony unreliable in several key aspects and noted significant discrepancies between her judicial statement and her cross-examination responses. The case proceedings continued with examination of evidence and documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts