Raju Ganapati Naik, Age 42 yrs, R/o. Kurigadde, Bargi, Kumta vs Madevi Gajanan Marathi, Age 60 yrs, R/o. Guddenevalase, Gundabal, Ankola — 1834/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 18-Jun-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK710017392025

Filing Number

189/2025

Filing Date

28-Mar-2025

Registration No

1834/2025

Registration Date

20-Jun-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA

Judge

633-Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Raju Ganapati Naik, Age 42 yrs, R/o. Kurigadde, Bargi, Kumta

    Adv. Priyanka H Kagal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Madevi Gajanan Marathi, Age 60 yrs, R/o. Guddenevalase, Gundabal, Ankola

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 14-May-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: 1834/2025 Court Order dated 24-04-2026 This case involves a property/land dispute between petitioner Raju Ganapati Naik (42 years) and respondent Madevi Gajanan Marathi (60 years). The petitioner's testimony describes his occupation involving JCB work and brick/tile business, his residential history across multiple locations, and claims regarding agricultural land holdings. The petitioner also testifies about renting a house for ₹2,500 monthly over an 8-year period without a formal rental agreement. The court heard witness statements and examined the petitioner's account during the hearing. The case appears to be at the evidence-gathering stage with cross-examination proceedings initiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  8. 22-Jan-2026

    Refered to Mediation

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  9. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  10. 01-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  11. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  12. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  13. 29-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  14. 13-Sep-2025

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  15. 20-Aug-2025

    Lokadalath

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  16. 30-Jul-2025

    Issue Summons to accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  17. 10-Jul-2025

    Steps

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  18. 20-Jun-2025

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  19. 19-Jun-2025

    For Consideration

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  20. 18-Jun-2025

    objection

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  21. 03-Jun-2025

    Notice

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  22. 07-May-2025

    Notice

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  23. 25-Apr-2025

    Sworn Statement

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  24. 16-Apr-2025

    Sworn Statement

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,kumta

  25. 28-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 28-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1834/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1834/2025 Court Order dated 24-04-2026 This case involves a property/land dispute between petitioner Raju Ganapati Naik (42 years) and respondent Madevi Gajanan Marathi (60 years). The petitioner's testimony describes his occupation involving JCB work and brick/tile business, his residential history across multiple locations, and claims regarding agricultural land holdings. The petitioner also testifies about renting a house for ₹2,500 monthly over an 8-year period without a formal rental agreement. The court heard witness statements and examined the petitioner's account during the hearing. The case appears to be at the evidence-gathering stage with cross-examination proceedings initiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case