Raju Ganapati Naik, Age 42 yrs, R/o. Kurigadde, Bargi, Kumta vs Madevi Gajanan Marathi, Age 60 yrs, R/o. Guddenevalase, Gundabal, Ankola — 1834/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK710017392025
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
189/2025
Filing Date
28-03-2025
Registration No
1834/2025
Registration Date
20-06-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA
Judge
633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Raju Ganapati Naik, Age 42 yrs, R/o. Kurigadde, Bargi, Kumta
Adv. Priyanka H Kagal
Respondent(s)
Madevi Gajanan Marathi, Age 60 yrs, R/o. Guddenevalase, Gundabal, Ankola
Hearing History
Judge: 633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 24-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 01-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 02-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 1834/2025 Court Order dated 24-04-2026 This case involves a property/land dispute between petitioner Raju Ganapati Naik (42 years) and respondent Madevi Gajanan Marathi (60 years). The petitioner's testimony describes his occupation involving JCB work and brick/tile business, his residential history across multiple locations, and claims regarding agricultural land holdings. The petitioner also testifies about renting a house for ₹2,500 monthly over an 8-year period without a formal rental agreement. The court heard witness statements and examined the petitioner's account during the hearing. The case appears to be at the evidence-gathering stage with cross-examination proceedings initiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1834/2025 Court Order dated 24-04-2026 This case involves a property/land dispute between petitioner Raju Ganapati Naik (42 years) and respondent Madevi Gajanan Marathi (60 years). The petitioner's testimony describes his occupation involving JCB work and brick/tile business, his residential history across multiple locations, and claims regarding agricultural land holdings. The petitioner also testifies about renting a house for ₹2,500 monthly over an 8-year period without a formal rental agreement. The court heard witness statements and examined the petitioner's account during the hearing. The case appears to be at the evidence-gathering stage with cross-examination proceedings initiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts