St. Milagires Credit Souharda Co-op Ltd., Head office Karwar, Branch-Gokarna, Kumta vs Charanraj Kamaraj, 34 yrs, Business, Astapanahalli, Chennagiri, Davanagere, now at near bus Stand, — 1418/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: ISSUE NBW. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK710005172025
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
57/2025
Filing Date
24-01-2025
Registration No
1418/2025
Registration Date
07-05-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA
Judge
633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
St. Milagires Credit Souharda Co-op Ltd., Head office Karwar, Branch-Gokarna, Kumta
Adv. Mangalmurti Ganapati Sabhahit
Respondent(s)
Charanraj Kamaraj, 34 yrs, Business, Astapanahalli, Chennagiri, Davanagere, now at near bus Stand,
Hearing History
Judge: 633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA
ISSUE NBW
ISSUE NBW
ISSUE NBW
ISSUE NBW
ISSUE NBW
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | ISSUE NBW |
| 05-02-2026 | ISSUE NBW |
| 31-12-2025 | ISSUE NBW |
| 20-11-2025 | ISSUE NBW |
| 30-10-2025 | ISSUE NBW |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 1418/2025 St. Milagires Credit Souharda Co-op Ltd. v. Charanraj Kamaraj The court examined witness testimony and documentary evidence on 29-01-2025 in this credit recovery case. The petitioner (cooperative credit society) presented certified copies of loan documents including the loan application, agreement, hypothecation agreement, demand promissory note, and bank statements. The court found the petitioner's case properly substantiated and directed that judgment be rendered in favor of the petitioner as requested, based on witness examination and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1418/2025 St. Milagires Credit Souharda Co-op Ltd. v. Charanraj Kamaraj The court examined witness testimony and documentary evidence on 29-01-2025 in this credit recovery case. The petitioner (cooperative credit society) presented certified copies of loan documents including the loan application, agreement, hypothecation agreement, demand promissory note, and bank statements. The court found the petitioner's case properly substantiated and directed that judgment be rendered in favor of the petitioner as requested, based on witness examination and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts