St. Milagires Credit Souharda Co-op Ltd., Head office Karwar, Branch-Gokarna, Kumta vs Charanraj Kamaraj, 34 yrs, Business, Astapanahalli, Chennagiri, Davanagere, now at near bus Stand, — 1418/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: ISSUE NBW. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK710005172025

ISSUE NBW

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

Filing Number

57/2025

Filing Date

24-01-2025

Registration No

1418/2025

Registration Date

07-05-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA

Judge

633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142

Petitioner(s)

St. Milagires Credit Souharda Co-op Ltd., Head office Karwar, Branch-Gokarna, Kumta

Adv. Mangalmurti Ganapati Sabhahit

Respondent(s)

Charanraj Kamaraj, 34 yrs, Business, Astapanahalli, Chennagiri, Davanagere, now at near bus Stand,

Hearing History

Judge: 633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA

13-03-2026

ISSUE NBW

05-02-2026

ISSUE NBW

31-12-2025

ISSUE NBW

20-11-2025

ISSUE NBW

30-10-2025

ISSUE NBW

Interim Orders

29-01-2025
Deposition

Case Summary: 1418/2025 St. Milagires Credit Souharda Co-op Ltd. v. Charanraj Kamaraj The court examined witness testimony and documentary evidence on 29-01-2025 in this credit recovery case. The petitioner (cooperative credit society) presented certified copies of loan documents including the loan application, agreement, hypothecation agreement, demand promissory note, and bank statements. The court found the petitioner's case properly substantiated and directed that judgment be rendered in favor of the petitioner as requested, based on witness examination and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1418/2025 St. Milagires Credit Souharda Co-op Ltd. v. Charanraj Kamaraj The court examined witness testimony and documentary evidence on 29-01-2025 in this credit recovery case. The petitioner (cooperative credit society) presented certified copies of loan documents including the loan application, agreement, hypothecation agreement, demand promissory note, and bank statements. The court found the petitioner's case properly substantiated and directed that judgment be rendered in favor of the petitioner as requested, based on witness examination and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case