U.K. Souharda Credit Co-operative Limited Yellapur, Branch Gokarna, Kumta by Branch Manager vs Harish Nagesh Naik, Coolie, Hanehalli, Bankikodla, Kumta — 1447/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK710002442025

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

26th March 2026

Filing Number

20/2025

Filing Date

13-01-2025

Registration No

1447/2025

Registration Date

16-05-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA

Judge

633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142

Petitioner(s)

U.K. Souharda Credit Co-operative Limited Yellapur, Branch Gokarna, Kumta by Branch Manager

Adv. Mangalmurti Ganapati Sabhahit

Respondent(s)

Harish Nagesh Naik, Coolie, Hanehalli, Bankikodla, Kumta

Hearing History

Judge: 633-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,KUMTA

14-03-2026

EVIDENCE

06-03-2026

LOKADALATH

26-02-2026

EVIDENCE

11-02-2026

EVIDENCE

05-02-2026

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

15-05-2025
Deposition
20-11-2025
Deposition
11-02-2026
Deposition
26-02-2026
Deposition

Summary This is a Civil Case (CC No. 1447/2025) order dated 26-02-2026 from a Kannada court. The court examined witness testimony and documentary evidence regarding allegations of unauthorized transactions in an account (NIC account 0-221), an insurance policy assignment, and financial matters from 2022 onwards. The court found certain claims unsubstantiated due to lack of proper documentation and directed cross-examination of the witness, with the case proceeding to the next hearing stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a Civil Case (CC No. 1447/2025) order dated 26-02-2026 from a Kannada court. The court examined witness testimony and documentary evidence regarding allegations of unauthorized transactions in an account (NIC account 0-221), an insurance policy assignment, and financial matters from 2022 onwards. The court found certain claims unsubstantiated due to lack of proper documentation and directed cross-examination of the witness, with the case proceeding to the next hearing stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case